patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Chris Matthews Blasts Tea Party at Dominican Lecture

Packed hall listens to 'Hardball' host talk about his new book and current political problems.

 

MSNBC host and former Tip O’Neill aide Chris Matthews entertained a packed house at Dominican University Wednesday night, Nov. 9, with stories from his new book Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero. But the audience cheered the loudest for his snappy remarks about current political conditions and imitations of public figures.

The biggest laugh came when Matthews did a spot-on imitation of Bill Clinton, arguing that compared to Obama the Clintons have a wealth of political alliances and loyalty to draw on. Imagine, he said, Bill calling up old political allies and saying about Hillary, in his trademark southern drawl, 'Come on, she’s ready to go.’

Matthews was on a book tour promoting his Kennedy biography that he had been working on for years, gathering interviews and recollections of the president.

The talk was co-sponsored by Dominican’s Institute for Leadership Studies and Book Passage. Matthews started out by commending the independent bookstore.

“Little bookstores are saving our country,” he said.

Matthews' new book is largely glowing about the popular president, using previously untranscribed oral histories with top campaign managers, interviews with people that knew Kennedy as a child and young man, notes from an interview with Jacqueline Kennedy immediately after Kennedy’s death and more in-depth research.

And he drew on that research to tell stories to the crowd about Kennedy’s childhood at his up-scale boarding school, where he may have gotten the inspiration for the line ‘ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.’ Matthews went on to detail Kennedy’s actions during World War II after his PT 109 boat was smashed to pieces and he and his men had to swim to safety.

But it was the president’s cool actions during the Cuban Missile Crisis that Matthews said saved the country. The fact that Kennedy didn’t bomb Cuba, despite urging from his generals to do so, just proves, said Matthews, that “war’s too important to be left to the generals.”

To illustrate the point that many of the generals were too trigger-happy, Matthews said that General Douglas MacArthur wanted to implement holster-mounted nuclear weapons for every solider in order to boost morale. The idea seems obviously crazy to us now.

Matthews came back to the anti-military sentiment as the crowd quizzed him on current events.

Calling the current crop of Republican presidential candidates a “clown act,” Matthews said that it was important for whoever was president to be ready to make a serious decision about sending troops into a war or pulling them out – instead of simply saying that they would ask the generals on the ground. The generals on the ground, he said, do what they’re told to do by the president.

Though Matthews said he had a number of lessons Obama could take from Kennedy – a topic about which he wrote in TIME last week – the main difference between then and now was the political sentiment that has swept through D.C. with many of the Tea Party candidates.

“Those Tea Party people are just awful,” he said.

The fundamental problem, Matthews argued, was a basic misunderstanding of the Constitution. Under our representative democratic republic, we elect people to represent us and act on our behalf. “We don’t send them to D.C. to not govern.”

And, that, he said, is the big problem right now. After the Republicans won the majority in the last election, it would have made sense for them to present a budget deal to the Democrats that was favorable to them: a number of large spending cuts with a few tax increases on the rich. That is a deal that the Democrats wouldn’t have liked, but would have accepted.

Instead, the Republican presidential candidates – so eager for Tea Party votes – have all said they would reject even a 10-to-1 deal, with ten times the budget cuts for every tax increase, because they won’t accept any compromise on tax increases.

Even in the current political turmoil, Matthews did call out a handful of office-holders that are true statesmen, work hard, and don’t give into the whims of current trends. Among those, he said, Senator Barbara Boxer is one politician who doesn’t bend with the wind and hasn’t changed much in her beliefs since being a Marin Supervisor. Every year he thinks she’s too liberal to get re-elected and every year she makes it happen.

“I don’t think she’s changed a bit,” he said.

Related Topics: Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Chris Matthews, Dominican University, Hillary Clinton, and Tea Party
Did you go? What did you think? Tell us in the comments.

Michael

1:44 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011

Amazing comments from this guy about Boxer. He is correct that she doesn't bend much but she also is a very ineffective leader. She has one of the worst ratings of any senior politician. But alas the drones keep voting her back into office. She accepts zero responsibility for any of our current problems and always points her finger at others to blame. We deserve and must have better representation. Do we really want to continue business as usual in Washington with representation like Boxer? If so continue to vote for this entrenched career politician. She is paid well by the lobbyists who are running the show. Perhaps she will soon help us all and retire like her counterpart Lynn Woolsey. Wake up CA voters people like Boxer are stealing us blind. .

Reply

Shirl

8:23 am on Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Chris Matthew's comments on Barbara Boxer were the opposite of the way Michael portrayed her. Chris Matthews considers her to be a strong supporter of liberal views. It is gauling that Michael would say Boxer is stealing us blind as if THE REPUBLICAN TEA PARTY KOCH BROTHER PARTY is all upright and honest. Really balanced view point and comments (sarcasm intended).

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael

2:19 pm on Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Thanks for your input Shirl. If you read my comments nowhere did I mention or discuss a political party. If it is not evident to you that the current bunch in the congress and senate are not representing the middle class taxpayers then you are buying into the political rhetoric each party serves up to blame the other. I am well aware of the Kochs and of the misguided focus of some who call themselves part of the tea party. I believe the current shape of the US economy is a direct result of our limited 2 party system. Boxer must accept some responsibility for our current conditions as she has been entrenched in the senate. By accepting no responsibility what has she been doing? By accepting no responsibility is she telling us that she is perfect and has never made a bad decision or might have been wrong some of the time? If you like the direction we are headed then continue to blindly vote for Boxer or other incumbents. I am looking for real change not the kind that the current government has been giving us. Our debt continues to soar. Do you like this? I am looking for smart independent representation regardless of what party they come from. Nothing will change as long as people continue to vote in the same folks time and time again and then expect a different outcome. That is the definition of insanity as they say. So now that we know you are a democrat, perhaps you will tell us what Boxer has done for the taxpayers?

Leave a comment