.
Feedback

Attorneys Continue to Fire Salvos in Horse Neglect Case

Four horses were confiscated from a West Marin ranch in December and treated for emergency medical reasons. The ranchers' attorney said it was an unjustified move.

The rift continues between the Marin Humane Society and a West Marin horse breeder accused of neglecting animals, with each side fingering the other for wrongdoing.

The attorney for Jill and Alex Burnell of Gray Fox Farms, which has had four horses hauled away for emergency medical treatment, has accused the Novato-based Marin Humane Society of releasing photos of underweight horses to spur fundraising efforts and humiliate her clients.

"I don't know what horse that is a photo of, or when it was taken, and at this point I am pretty skeptical of everything that originates from their offices," said Maggie Weems, the Fairfax-based attorney who represents the Burnells. "This is Photoshopped clip-art for all of its value, especially when they are using the scandal they have created by their own faulty investigation as a fundraising technique, which also strikes me as inappropriate." 

The humane society's lawyer counterattacked Wednesday.

"Nothing is so obnoxious and absurd as to think that Marin Humane Society, which has been around 100 years taking care of the needs of Marin, has decided to pick on this one woman," attorney Bruce Wagman said. "... People have called us congratulating us for pursuing this issue."

And as for making the horse neglect case a for-profit pursuit, Wagman added, "Marin Humane Society is a nonprofit organization and tells people about what it's doing and asks for donations. That's part of being a nonprofit. It's so laughable to say we're doing it to raise money. If that's what we're doing, we're doing it pretty badly because we're not making any money doing this."

Earlier this month, the Burnells tried to sue the Marin Humane Society to get four confiscated horses returned and prohibit animal control officers from their property off Chileno Valley Road near Petaluma. But Marin Superior Court Judge Roy Chernus dismissed the suit on Jan. 8, saying the humane society was justified in addressing reports of horse starvation and untreated injuries.

On Jan. 24, the Burnells tried for the second time to have horses returned from temporary homes where veterinarians are watching their progress. A hearing officer has yet to rule about the status of two mares, but Weems said the odds appear long. She said the hearing officer, Albert Burnham, is hired by the humane society.

"This guy is 20 for 20 in favor of Marin Humane Society," she said. "I'm not holding my breath. ... He has never returned an animal to an owner or caretaker, so this is not an independent review by any means."

One horse taken off the property last month was Romantic Star, a stallion known nationally among warmblood breeders and in dressage circles. Weems said Romantic Star was just muddy and slightly injured from a fight with another stallion. He is being treated at a veterinary clinic on the campus of UC Davis along with two mares from the farm. The Marin Humane Society is caring for the fourth horse.

Just prior to the December Romantic Star has been sold to a woman in Georgia who wants custody, but the horse is seen as evidence in a criminal investigation, Weems said.

Weems has maintained the confiscated horses that appeared thin were not neglected, malnourished or mistreated and that they should have been returned to the Burnells' custody immediately after they were evaluated.

"If a horse really is starving or has medical conditions that perhaps causes an unsightly or thin appearance, there are blood panels and chemical tests that will reveal whether or not a horse is in a metabolic condition so that somebody could objectively say a horse may not be receiving sufficient calories," Weems said. "But all the blood tests were normal for these horses and scored better (on a body condition scale) than the scores given by the Marin Humane Society."

Wagman said the animal control officers acted accordingly after receiving calls of concern from people who saw ribs showing prominently on the bellies of several horses at pasture.

"There's a difference between being thin and being in a state of near starvation and suffering," Wagman said, "and these horses were in the latter category. People who are facing charges of neglect ... they always try to put it over that it wasn't that bad. But the spaces between these horses' ribs were not normal. ... In both situations, there was a need for prompt action."

Wagman the confiscated horses are recovering well. Animal control officers have not many additional visits to Gray Fox Farms, he said.

 

What's your reaction to the case? Tell us in the comments!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.