.
Feedback

Is the Prop. 37 GMO Labeling Food Fight Over?

Election day is long gone and Proposition 37, a measure that would have required genetically-modified food labeling, has reportedly failed. But some GMO labeling advocates say the outcome could change after all the votes are counted.

It might seem like old news that Proposition 37, the ballot measure calling for the labeling of genetically engineered foods, was defeated Nov. 6, with nearly 53 percent of California voters rejecting it.

But is it over? 

Some groups, including Sustainable Fairfax and Good Earth, say not so fast, posting on Facebook that the outcome of the race could change after all the ballots are counted. 

The proposition has tallied 4.6 million "Yes" votes and 5.2 million "No" votes with 100 percent of the California precincts reporting.

But on Nov. 9, the California Secretary of State reported there were still 3.3 million ballots left to be counted. County officials have until Dec. 4 to finish processing and counting ballots. The California Secretary of State will certify election results on Dec. 14. (The Secretary of State does not annouce the winners of any contest before that date, but media outlets and campaigns usually call an election earlier.) 

Some Marin groups and circulating e-mails are encouraging voters to call the Secretary of State to make sure everything gets counted. But, as provisional and mail-in ballot counting is still happening, calling the state isn’t needed, Secretary of State officials confirmed Tuesday morning.

Secretary of State communications officials told Patch every ballot is always counted, no matter how close or far apart the “Yes” and “No” votes are for an item. 

Many counties, including Marin, have thousands of provisional and mail-in ballots yet to be counted. After Election Day, , which has left some races hanging in balance. The Marin County Registrar of Voters updated results Nov. 9 but still has an estimated 25,000 ballots to count.

Good Earth Marketing Director Sheila McNulty said they were still in the process of discovering exactly how many votes had not been counted yet statewide. “There is concern that there still is the possibility that it could pass – it’s not out the realm of possibility,” she said.

Check out this map showing which counties in California voted in support of Proposition 37. 

She said the local “Yes on 37” group will meet on Thursday to discuss next steps or determine if asking for a recount is needed.

“We’re kind of catching our breath from pre-election efforts and will see if this is something that possibly could change," McNulty added.

The ballot measure was a costly one and a bit of a David vs. Goliath battle. Food giants like Monsanto, DuPoint, PepsiCo, General Mills and Kellogg raised nearly $50 million for No on Prop. 37, while the Yes on 37 campaign raised roughly $7 million. 

Proposition 37 backers including those with Label GMOs, have formally said that even though Proposition 37 didn’t pass, it was far from a failure as it gained national exposure to the anti-GMO food movement.

“Pesticide companies led by Monsanto and DuPont, and processed food corporations led by Pepsi and Kraft spent an unprecedented amount of money to confuse and deceive Californians into voting against their right to know what’s in their food,” said Kristin Lynch, Pacific Region director for Washington D.C.-based nonprofit Food & Water Watch in a release after the election. The group helped create a star-studded “Yes on 37” YouTube video featuring Danny Devito, Bill Maher, Emily Deschanel, Dave Matthews and the cast of It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia.

Despite trailing statewide, Prop 37 fared well in Marin, where it has garnered more than 61 percent support.

“While disappointed in the result, we believe that this movement to label GE foods is stronger than ever and we will continue to build a robust national grassroots campaign to push for mandatory labeling across the country,” Lynch said.

Proposition 37 supporters are reportedly gathering signatures to put a similar measure on Washington state’s ballot for 2013. This month Washington voters backed same-sex marriage and legalized marijuana, leaving California – long considered the state for progressive measures – in the dust.

GMO labeling legislation is also in the works in Vermont and Connecticut, according to the Los Angeles Times. 

Whole Foods Market took a at the Mill Valley Whole Foods on Miller Avenue.

Fairfax’s Good Earth Natural Foods also showed strong support for Proposition 37.

GMOs are created by gene splicing techniques. Opponents argue it creates unstable combinations of plant, animal, bacterial and viral genes. GMO labeling is mandatory is almost 50 countries in the world.

According to the nonprofit Non GMO Project, “high-risk crops” that are .

Are you, as a consumer, going to do anything now that Proposition 37 has failed? Are you more aware of GMOs? Will it impact your shopping decisions?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.