PG&E Submits Smart Meter Opt-Out, But Wants to Charge for It

In an effort to appease critics of the wireless devices, utility giant serves up proposal that would force those who don't want to use them to pay for it.

PG&E has submitted a proposal that would charge customers an upfront fee, plus monthly fees and an exit fee, for those who want to opt out of the utility's .

The company submitted its proposal on Thursday to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in response to a  requiring PG&E to provide options for residents with concerns about the SmartMeters.

Opponents of the wireless devices, which are meant to reduce energy consumption by monitoring utility use and transmitting the information in real time, argue the radio frequency waves emitted by the meters are detrimental to their health.

PG&E's proposal would give customers the option of having PG&E turn off or disable the radios inside their SmartMeters, which would eliminate the radio frequency, according to company.

The utility proposed charging $135 to $270 upfront to have an employee turn off the meters, plus a $14 to $20 monthly fee to keep it off. Customers could choose to pay a per-kilowatt-hour fee instead of the fixed monthly fee.

PG&E would also charge customers an exit fee when they terminate service so future customers could use the SmartMeters.

The utility estimated that about 145,800 customers could choose to have the meters turned off over the next two years, causing an estimated $84.4 million in capital costs and expenses.

The costs include sending personnel to turn off the meters, sending meter readers to manually check the modified meters every month, and upgrading the rest of the SmartMeter radio frequency network to compensate for any network degradation caused by the turned-off radios.

In San Anselmo and Fairfax, less than half of the SmartMeters have been installed. According to PG&E meter installation data through March 4, PG&E has installed 2,079 gas SmartMeters, or 32.8 percent of the 6,336 total gas meters at residences and businesses in the city. For electric meters, PG&E has installed 2,297 SmartMeters, or 33.4 percent of the 6,886 total electric meters in the city.

In Fairfax, where recently won the Local Government Ordinance of the Year award from PublicCEO, fewer of the meters have been installed. According to the same PG&E data as of March 4, 217 gas SmartMeters, or 5.5 percent of the 3,886 of the total gas meters in the city. For electric meters, PG&E has installed just 67, or 1.6 percent of the 4,178 total electric meters in Fairfax.

According to the proposal presented by PG&E, customers can also ask to have their SmartMeters moved to different locations on their property at estimated costs of $2,500 to $4,500 for overhead-meter customers and $6,000 to $11,000 for underground customers.

PG&E's net income in 2010 was $1.1 billion.

As of March 1, the utility had installed 7.7 million gas and electric SmartMeters in the state, which it says only transmit radio waves for milliseconds at a time and for very short durations. In Fairfax, it has said the meters are not yet transmitting.

The company estimates exposure to the low-frequency waves total about 45 seconds every 24 hours - much less than cell phones and microwave ovens. Read about how the meters work .

Some residents remain skeptical of PG&E's estimates, though, and say a more thorough independent review should be done before the SmartMeters are thrust upon them.

Speakers packed a CPUC meeting in San Francisco on Thursday and described health conditions they and their loved ones had suffered since the SmartMeters were installed. Many called the proposed charges a form of extortion.

"I shouldn't have to pay more for the right to opt out of irradiation," Petaluma resident Dana Davis said before details of the proposed fee structure had been released.

Davis said she didn't have a SmartMeter and didn't want one, while other residents described experiencing migraines, heart palpitations, and sleep problems after receiving the devices.

Some speakers questioned the effectiveness of the proposed opt-out program in reducing radiation given that other meters would be modified to compensate for those that had been disabled.

--Bay City News Service

Inside9 March 26, 2011 at 04:18 AM
PiG&E now wants the Public Utilities Commission to godfather an extortion game on the lucky people of California. They demand my analog meter for a shiny new possibly toxic smartmeter. They say I have no choice. I must then pay them 270 dollars to turn off (disable) the wireless so that it functions like my old meter plus 20 dollars or more a month in perpetuity. Oh, and when I move or die, whichever comes first, I must pay them a substantial "exit fee". I think if the truth were ever revealed, at this point PiG$E might admit they would rather break my kneecaps. I know how easy it is to disable a smartmeter's "radio function" (pulsed microwave radiation). It takes about a minute or less. But the gangsters at PG&E want to triple dip me with costs and fees. There are people who for personal and/or health reasons prefer not to have this piece of technocrap on their homes. What about apartment dwellers who have 10 of these mounted outside their bedroom wall and have an aversion to 24/7 wireless? Yeah, even if they can personally afford to cough up the big bucks (over $500 extra dollars the first year), how do they get all their neighbors to help them out and buckle under this extortion scheme? What a MISERABLE company! Hold on to your old meters, complain to our government, don't encourage these gangsters!
E. Williams March 26, 2011 at 03:56 PM
Well said Inside9!
Inside9 March 26, 2011 at 04:06 PM
Thanks. Hopefully enough people will learn about the truly unnecessary risks we are being exposed to with these meters. As a friend of mine said, "When you are standing at the edge of a cliff, progress is taking a step backward!"
Jennifer Faria April 02, 2011 at 12:43 AM
Here are some smart meter myths: http://www.energyinyourlife.com/article.php?t=100000066
Inside9 April 02, 2011 at 05:48 AM
Energy planners who admire the theory behind smartmeters refuse to acknowledge the fact that real people in large numbers are having their health and well-being compromised. There is no justification for allowing this, NONE. I have spoken to them, they are real. They could be your mother, sister or wife. In this case, the scientific method was abandoned in the face of money. In California there were no pilot studies of physiological effects, no environmental reports just greed unabated. The Roman Empire did not have the technology to realize that lead in their pipes and diets was poisoning the citizenry, but we now know it was happening. The "benefits of smartmeters" are still theoretical but the observed suffering is real and well documented. A benevolent government would stop in the face of thousands of negative reports and consider other alternatives in promoting energy efficiency. Science does not always require mortality statistics as part of its proof. A precautionary approach is required. Money does not necessitate brutality!!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »