.
Feedback

Just Say No to Paper and Plastic

Marin County's new bag ordinance is part of a growing movement to replace single-use bags with reusable ones.

 

It’s time to stock up on reusable bags for your backpacks, purses and car trunks.  The movement to eliminate single-use bags from stores is gaining momentum.

The Marin County bag ordinance in effect as of Jan. 1 comes on the heels of Fairfax’s plastic bag ban approved by nearly 80% of Fairfax voters in 2009. The Fairfax measure, spearheaded by Renee Goddard, was a great success for the town. Plastic bags are are not only disastrous for the environment, but jam up the recycling stream and are rarely recycled.  


Goddard emphasized that the Fairfax bag ban was pursued in the spirit of collaboration with Fairfax businesses. “Most of our retailers were already moving away from the use of single-use plastics. I believe they experienced this legislation as a positive, unifying opportunity to celebrate our common desire to do what is right for the environment," she said.  

The Marin County ordinance, impacting unincorporated areas of Marin, takes a big step forward by eliminating single-use plastic bags and mandating a minimum five-cent charge for paper bags, making reuseable bags even more attractive.

Although the new law does not apply to incorporated cities and towns like Fairfax, Good Earth Natural Foods has stepped up to the plate by voluntarily participating, and is graciously donating the five-cent fee to Sustainable Fairfax. Although it is far more eco-friendly to bring reusable bags to the store than purchase paper ones (see our Sustainable New Year’s Resolutions), Sustainable Fairfax will put these funds to good use by helping the town achieve its zero-waste goals. Fairfax's zero-waste ordinance aims for 95 percent diversion by 2020, which is five years ahead of the County.

Hopefully, other cities and businesses in incorporated Marin will recognize the importance of the plastic bag ban and paper bag charge and follow Good Earth’s lead. Paper bags are extremely damaging to the environment, destroying trees and ecosystems, wasting massive amounts of water and energy, and requiring harmful chemicals to produce and recycle them.  

The good news is that bag bans are spreading in California and beyond. They have been implemented in ten states within the United States, as well as many developed and developing countries.  

California Assemblywoman Julia Brownley intends on continuing her fight to implement a plastic bag ban statewide in 2012. The Assemblywoman's previous plastic bag ban bill AB 1998 was rejected by the California Senate in 2008, but, given the expansion of plastic bag ordinances across the state including unincorporated Los Angeles and the City of San Jose, the political landscape is now quite different.

The benefits of such legislation are clear. China implemented a plastic bag ban in 2008 and reportedly saved 60,000 tons of plastics, equal to five million tons of coals, and reduced carbon dioxide emissions by over 10 million tons.

With efforts from governments, businesses and citizens, together we can curb the wasteful and needless practice of single-use bags.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.