.
Feedback

'Regis'-cide

Regis Philbin, the 'king' of inane pop culture who visits Book Passage on Sunday, deserves his end.

Once considered the ultimate crime, regicide, the act of bumping off the king, has faded considerably from the list of capital crimes in this decidedly non-regal era of celeb-hood we are currently mucking through. Frankly, offing royalty is not high on my list.

There is, however, one “regis-cide,” to which I would happily subscribe. I am referring to the end-of-days of the career of Regis Philbin, the recently retired talk show host who doesn’t so much deserve death as the permanent encasement of his vocal chords in a block of Lucite at the Museum of Brain-Damaging Media.  

You do have to hand it to the Philbins of the Bronx, New York. Their son, Regis Francis Xavier, even if less a king than a sodden prince of professional vacuousity, has more-or-less single-handedly spent the past five decades adding to his record of spending more time on television than any other single human. In this case, to restate Mel Brooks, "maybe it’s not so good to be king."

By now you may have guessed that I do not like Regis Philbin. Actually, fill in the blanks: I dislike, mislike, disrelish, disfavor, abominate, loathe, detest, abhor, have no use for, am allergic to, gag at, am disgusted by, shudder at the mere thought of … you get the idea.

And so, as he comes to in Corte Madera this Sunday to flog his new book, How I Got This Way, we might want to see how and why Regis has done so much to degrade the intellectual capital of America, while at the same time legitimizing the art of sinusoidal chitchat that has become the banal wallpaper of a culture that refuses to shut up or, alternatively, actually sit and listen.

It wasn’t always necessarily so. All we need do is return to the summer of that pivotal year, 1969, to see how American culture veered off-track, ceding what was such a promising and hopeful era into the kind of predictable talk-show rhetoric that has helped lower the net IQ of America, at the same time cheapening the discourse of media life. Or, as Dick Cavett famously noted, “as long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it.”

That summer of '69 was the time of the Beatles' breakup, and the celestial Mr. Cavett was able to help the world overcome the trauma by managing to get Paul, George, John and Yoko on his late night ABC talk show, although not simultaneously. The gymnastic champion Cavett was also able to convince rock diva Joni Mitchell to appear on his show rather than helicopter that evening to Woodstock, which led the disappointed Mitchell to sit down in her New York hotel room and write the anthem, “Woodstock.”

“By the time we got to Woodstock," it had been a year in which Cavett interviewed Lillian Hellman, Gore Vidal, Janis Joplin, Groucho Marx, Judy Garland, Truman Capote, Hedy Lamar, The Committee, Joan Baez, Cosby Stills and Nash, Woody Allen, Ruth Gordon, Gina Lollobrigida, Federico Fellini, and on through the fiery contrails of a culture in afterburn.

For those of us who missed Woodstock, it was Cavett who could bring the worst and best out of such cultural icons as Norman Mailer and Katherine Hepburn, the latter of whom proved to be so simpatico a subject that the interview with Cavett was extended into a second hour.

And then, suddenly, without so much as a bye-bye-your-leave, it was over. In the place of the droll, elegant Cavett, there stood, what? Whom?? Joey Bishop??? And next to the Vegas lounge-lizard comedian whose trump card was a friendship with Sinatra, in matching Nehru jackets, stood a nervous thirty-something sidekick/announcer named Regis Philbin. Watching, it became clear that this Notre Dame graduate’s greatest, most obvious talent was to provide the comedian/host with a target for his not-especially-funny contrived gibes.

It was like going from fresh creamery butter to Parkay, and it helped cement into place the Carson/McMahon model of light, pre-REM-sleep chit-chat, whose ambassador over the years increasingly became one Regis F. X. Philbin's weak-kneed, middle-American material did nothing so much as reflect the end of a brilliant era of cultural exceptionalism and the beginning of the “Who Wants to be a Millionaire,” “America’s Got Talent” era of everyone's their own quiz show host.

So if you do go to Book Passage this Sunday, you might want to leave a space open at the end of the self-congratulatory clap-trap and ask “King” Philbin if it doesn’t give him sweaty palms knowing that he inhabits the outskirts of the cultural space of the marvelous, funny, deep, ineffable Dick Cavett? On second thought, forget it. It’s probably best to let retired Regis’s lie.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.