.
Feedback

Scoop Special Report: The Cost of Red Hill's Facelift

A look at the players and victims behind the major renovations at Red Hill Shopping Center.

Last Tuesday, I took my ten-month-old nephew to .

The plan had come together after I'd heard from my editor that Easy Street, a San Anselmo haven for lazy breakfasts and big families, would be shutting its doors for good on Sunday. The walls were pasted with blow-ups of a letter written by the cafe's owners to their patrons and the community.

The note read, in part:

I am a father of 5 kids and grandfather of 4. I still live in my old condo in the canal and I will still continue to dream [of having] a place that people like me with kids can come and have a healthy meal while their kids joyfully [play] in the play area. Again, thank you so much for all the years of patronage and sharing with me the joy of raising your kids and seeing your kids raising their kids. My heart is broken for my wonderful, great employees who have stuck by me for so many years.

The letter begins with a detailed account of Easy Street's eviction, based around ten months of contested back rent. Read it in full here.

Easy Street Cafe has watched me grow-up as well. Its kind staff and talented chefs indulged my orders of cheeseburgers and hot chocolates when I was 8, and continued in this tradition when I graduated to coffee and eggs over easy.

My nephew ate his first pancake there last week, and sure enough, was given a small, baby-friendly toy to take home with him. It was bittersweet to know he'll never remember his only visit there, but at least I will. 

I wish the story stopped with Easy Street, but more businesses in the Red Hill community remain in danger of closing. , owned by the same people who own Easy Street, will face stiff comptetion if a proposed plan for a Chipotle franchise is installed. Another business at risk is the . 

Elvis Johnson has owned the pet center since 1998. Before him, two other owners ran the store going back 25 years. Now Johnson faces a similar fate to Easy Street. He has learned his lease, due to expire at the end of June, will not be renewed. In addition, a Pet Food Express is slated to move in at Red Hill.

"We could easily co-exist," Johnson laments, "because our customer service and prices blow the competition out of the water. But we are not being given a chance to compete."

Johnson has written letters encouraging Red Hill's management to negotiate a new lease, but he has received no response. 

"Even my phone calls aren't returned," he adds. 

Aside from the obvious hardship of losing his business, Johnson also worries for the young people he employs in a part-time capacity. He knows the value of after-school jobs, and many kids have had their first jobs at Red Hill Pet Center. So what can upset community members due to help?

"If anyone wants to help us, they should voice their concerns with the town council and planning department. They can also write letters to the Red Hill Shopping Center."

You can learn more over at the Red Hill Pet Center's website.

The right answers aren't easily given in a complex situation such as what is happening at Red Hill. Certainly there many balls in play, but is the cost getting too high? How many long-time local, independent businesses will San Anselmo be willing to lose in the name of aesthetics and profit? 


[Editor's Note: Calls and e-mails to Redhill Shopping Center management have not been returned.]



Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.