.
Feedback

Sir Francis Drake discussion goes on and on

Workshop Wednesday night looks into future of street.

On Wednesday, Aug. 25 the discussion of the traffic situation continued on for the eleventh month with a workshop held at San Anselmo Town Hall.

The Town Manager, Public Works Director, Chief of Police, two Police Captains, a Fire Department Battalion Chief, the Director of the Transportation Authority of Marin, and four council members gathered together with about seven members of the public to hear a traffic consultant consider -- for at least the sixth time -- the ever-growing traffic concerns on Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. 

Many interesting facts about the situation were clarified and placed in context at the workshop. First, the  main concern appears to be pedestrian safety for anyone walking on the south side of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard between Butterfield Road and the area just south of San Anselmo Avenue. One resident stated that he "feared" walking on that stretch. Another resident, Derek Mitchell, showed a piece of a car bumper that he picked up from a clipped telephone pole, along with a graphic photo of a crash in front of his house.

Along with this dramatic evidence, traffic consultant David Parisi & Associates, who conducted the most recent study, revealed some interesting and rather startling traffic figures from the area in question. Sir Francis Drake Boulevard between Butterfield Road and the Hub carries 35,000 cars per day! Or 10 million in a year!

Remarkably, some 40 percent or 14,000 car trips a day appear to be coming from Butterfield Road.

Police Chief Maynard also noted that even for that much traffic on Sir Francis Drake Boulevard there are relatively few accidents and the average speed is only about 31 miles per hour. In addition, so far this year 860 traffic citations have been issued and a radar-controlled speed indicator sign has been in place for the past few months.

Still, those statistics don't necessarily make the residents and pedestrians along the street feel safer.

Some creative possible solutions were discussed, mainly by the audience. One proposal was to close down one of the two lanes on Butterfield Road at Sir Francis Drake Boulevard during non-commute hours. Fire Battalion Chief McCarthy noted that before the two collector lanes on Butterfield Road were added several years ago, traffic backed-up past the fire house on Butterfield, impeding the entry and exit of fire trucks.

Another interesting, but politically-suicidal idea, was the opening of Fawn Drive over the hill to Terra Linda. (Few recall that a Supervisor race was lost over this very idea several decades ago!)

Among some of the other ideas put forth were widening the sidewalks away from the street, shaving the crown off the street to reduce the amount cars tip as they come around the corner or over the hill at Butterfield. Additionally, since the new crossing control systems placed at Madrone Avenue and Drake High School school intersections are slowing traffic, one could also be placed at San Anselmo Avenue. Finally, there was also the suggestion to revert to one of the solutions previously discussed in the road-diet study, simply reducing the traffic to one lane in each direction. This would allow parking on Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and slow traffic at the Hub. Council member Jeff Kroot appeared to be advocating for this approach. Captain Valeri of the police department noted, however, that drivers would be stepping into the traffic lane when exiting their parked cars.

While all of these creative and sometimes expensive solutions were being vetted, Diane Steinhauser, Executive Director of the Transportation Authority of Marin (TAM), clarified a letter TAM sent to the town in May. Essentially, the letter stated that since Sir Francis Drake Boulevard is the critical east-west link in Marin, adjustments to traffic flow on such an artery must include consideration of the regional traffic. Boiled down that means that if San Anselmo does anything that affects the traffic flow, mitigation would have to be provided. If the town did negatively affect regional traffic, federal road funds could possibly jeopardized. But, at the same time, Steinhauser noted that TAM has multiple funding sources that could assist the town in smaller fixes along the street.

Town Manager Debbie Stutsman told the audience that the council will be presented with options for action at the council meeting on Tuesday, Sept. 28 at Town Hall.

While the physical boundary of the problems on Sir Francis Drake Boulevard extend for a relatively short distance, the impact of any action taken will have major effects on those traveling from Sleepy Hollow, Fairfax, central Marin, and even from southern Sonoma County.

This is an issue that bears attention from the broadest community. And, eventually some actual action.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.