.
Feedback

Walgreens Ordered to Pay $16.6M Settlement for Dumping Hazardous Waste, Records

Drugstore chain with a store in San Anselmo faced a lawsuit brought by the Marin District Attorney's Office and 44 others claiming more than 600 of its stores in California illegally disposed of hazardous waste.

An Alameda County judge ordered Walgreen Co. on Thursday to pay $16.57 million to settle a lawsuit claiming that more than 600 of the chain's stores in California, including four Walgreens in Marin, illegally dumped hazardous waste and unlawfully disposed of customer records containing confidential medical information.

Under terms of the settlement, Walgreen Co. must pay $20,000 in civil penalties and cost recovery to the Marin County District Attorney's Office, as well as $4,000 to the waste management division of the county's public works department. There are four Walgreens stores in Marin: at 227 Shoreline Hwy. in Mill Valley, 820 Sir Francis Drake Blvd. in San Anselmo and 830 Third St. and 155 Northgate One in San Rafael.

In ordering Walgreen Co. to pay up, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Wynne Carvill concluded a civil enforcement lawsuit filed in Alameda County in June 2012 that was led by the District Attorneys of Alameda, San Joaquin, Solano, Monterey, Riverside, and Yolo, and the City Attorney of Los Angeles.

The legal action followed inspections of trash bins at Walgreens stores around the state. In the fall of 2009, investigators from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control and local environmental health agencies (CUPAs) conducted a series of waste inspections of dumpsters belonging to Walgreens’ stores, officials said. 

The inspections found that Walgreens "unlawfully handled and disposed of various hazardous wastes and materials over a six and one half year period, including pesticides, bleach, paint, aerosols, automotive products and solvents, pharmaceutical and bio hazardous wastes and other toxic, ignitable and corrosive materials."

The lawsuit also alleged that Walgreens stores "unlawfully disposed of customer records containing confidential medical information without preserving the confidentiality of the information therein. 

"California Walgreens’ stores have adopted enhanced policies and procedures designed to eliminate the disposal of hazardous waste products and confidential customer information records into store dumpsters," Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley said in a statement.

Walgreens spokesman Jim Graham noted that the company did not admit any wrongdoing in the settlement.

"But like a number of other major retailers who faced similar questions in California, we agreed to settle this case to avoid the time and expense of protracted litigation," he said in a statement. "We are fully committed to continuing to improve our waste disposal practices.”

“Since 2007, we have invested millions of dollars to develop and implement a comprehensive waste management program at all of our California stores to properly handle and dispose of discarded, damaged or expired consumer products that are covered by hazardous waste regulations in California," he continued. "We are continuing to strengthen our programs to ensure that these procedures are properly followed."

"Like" the San Anselmo - Fairfax Patch Facebook page and help us beat the Mill Valley Patch to 1,000 FB likes! 

Check out what else is on San Anselmo - Fairfax Patch

  • San Anselmo Council Approves Police Consolidation
  • VIDEOS: Rescued Great Horned Owl Gets Released in San Anselmo
  • Council Picks Coleman as San Anselmo 2013 Mayor
  • San Anselmo blotter: Coyote Sightings and Lots of Petty Theft
  • Fairfax blotter: The Neighbor Came in Through the (Bathroom?) Window 
  • Lifeline on the Bridge: CHP's Kevin Briggs

 "Like" us on Facebook  |  Follow us on Twitter  | Start a blog  | Follow us on Instagram  | Follow us on Pinterest | Get "Patched" in with our free newsletter


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.