Carpool Lane and Corporate Personhood Fight Takes First Step Toward Supreme Court

A Marin judge ruled Monday that Jonathan Frieman shouldn't have been driving in the carpool lane solo, although he argues that paperwork from his corporation counts as a person.


A Marin County judge ruled Monday that local activist Jonathan Frieman was guilty of driving alone in the carpool lane in October 2012, despite his claims that the pile of documents from his corporation in his passneger seat constituted another person.

Frieman, a 59-year-old San Rafael resident who has often challenged the idea of corporate personhood, drove solo in the carpool lane on Highway 101 in Novato just north of the Rowland exit on Oct. 2. When he was pulled over by a California Highway Patrol officer, Frieman claimed that a pile of documents next to him were part of a corporation he co-founded, the JoMiJo Foundation, and he was allowed to drive in the carpool lane without violation because the state's definiton of a person includes a corporation. 

Marin judge Frank Drago did not agree, and ordered Frieman to pay the $478 ticket or appeal the decision within 30 days.

In order to drive in a carpool lane, one must have two or more persons in a car. According to the California Vehcile Code, the definition of a person includes a natural person, firm, co-partnership, association, limited liability company or corporation.

"What we're talking about here is a pretty simple case," Frieman's attorney Ford Greene said in court Monday.

Greene argued that the state doesn't say anything about occupants in a vehicle, only persons, which presents a troubling double meaning. "Here the double meaning is 'person.' Is a 'person' a natural person? Is a 'person' a corporation? It is both?" said Greene, a San Anselmo council member.

Corporate personhood is a legal concept that enables a corporation to enjoy similiar rights as an individual, such as suing someone in court. Frieman said  and now they donate to charities and politics in ways that need more speculation.

Frieman's actions with the carpool lane were a political statement to challenge what he considers a "constitutionally vague" definition, Greene said.

"It's a novel argument," Drago said Monday, noting that he never heard a similar one in his years in traffic court. To Drago, the intent of the legislature when using the term "person" was to relieve traffic congestion. "A common sense interpretation is carrying a sheet of paper in no way relieves traffic congestion," he said.

Frieman has been attacking what he calls the “absurd” corporations-are-people definition for more than 10 years, putting himself as bait in the carpool lane roughly 25 times. Expecting that the judge would reject his argument, he intends to appeal the decision.

Several of Frieman's supporters attended his court appearance Monday afternoon. One of them was Pat Johnstone, a community organizer for Move to Amend, a nonprofit that hopes to change the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that corporations are persons.

"It appears there is some ambiguity," she said. "If corporations are people, then [Frieman's argument] should count."

Check out what else is on San Anselmo - Fairfax Patch:

  • IMAGES: San Anselmo Park Plans with Yoda and Indiana Jones Statues
  • Do You Use The Yellow Pages Anymore?
  • Marin Group Says ‘Sutro Sam’ the River Otter Making San Francisco His Home
  • Officials Urge Caution in Wake of Three Deaths Along Marin’s Coastline

Follow us for all the local news in your neighborhood! We’re on FacebookInstagram andTwitter.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something