.
Feedback

Congressional Candidates Seek to Stand Out From the Pack During Tuesday Debate

All in favor of federal funding for SMART, single-payer health care.

Five Democratic candidates in the 2nd Congressional District race held their first debate Tuesday in Petaluma, highlighting their positions on everything from job creation to the SMART rail project to Palestinian statehood in an effort to differentiate themselves in what will likely be a tight race for Rep. Lynn Woolsey seat.

The candidates, along with Republican candidate Daniel Roberts and Mendocino County pot doctor William Courtney, will reconvene tonight, at cncm.us as well as be aired on public access and commercial television stations and YouTube.

The Democratic candidates Tuesday night include:

  • Assemblymember , a former environmental attorney who has represented Marin and Southern Sonoma in Sacramento since 2006 and who stressed his political experience, including overcoming Sacramento gridlock to pass more than 50 pieces of legislation,
  • , a media critic, labor and anti-war activist who repeated his pledge to not take any corporate donations as well as his experience on foreign policy issues, and questioned the notion that taking money from special interests was required to win elections,
  • Marin County Supervisor and nurse practitioner who called healthcare the single most important issue facing the district and described herself as a healer who could “fix Washington’s sickness” and
  • Petaluma Councilwoman and web designer , who recounted her experience as defender of women’s rights and described herself as someone who knew how to listen to constituents.

The newly created district is roughly 600 miles long, stretching from the Golden Gate Bridge to the Oregon border. And whoever is sent to Congress in 2012 may very well stay for a long time because of voters’ tendency to reelect incumbents.

Asked about what they thought posed the greatest threat to national security, many of the candidates said they were worried about the growing disparity between the rich and the poor.

“We have tremendous threats that we face in terms of the deterioration of our own society, infrastructure, education, healthcare, housing and chronic unemployment,” said Norman Solomon. “Frankly a lot of the threat in Washington is well-meaning people who keep their mouths shut and pursue policies that are injurious to the well-being of our country.”

Lawson, who lives in San Rafael, said that in addition to growing poverty, she viewed energy dependence as the biggest threat to the country.

“We have a major addiction to foreign oil that causes a whole bunch of unfortunate ramifications in our foreign policy and we are not yet taking the steps we need to take and investing in alternative energy sources and renewables in order to thrive and be competitive in the global economy,” she said.

Another issue candidates were asked about was whether federal monies should be used to fund the SMART rail project, which has been plagued by cost overruns and, more recently, a recall effort. All said they favored federal assistance and said they continued to back the project because it would reduce traffic congestion and create construction jobs.

“One of the challenges we’re seeing now is that when SMART was put before the voters, there was only a quarter cent sales tax that was asked and it probably needed a half cent sales tax and now with the recession, we’re seeing the ramifications of that,” said Susan Adams.

“We have an opportunity with the current transportation bill to work to make sure SMART is eligible for federal funding, but we have to work with the SMART board to get it done,” said Renee, adding that she helped approve $3 million in extra funding for trails along the railway.

On the topic of helping small businesses stay afloat in the tough economy, the candidates focused on different things, with Solomon saying that fighting for a living wage was crucial to the economic sustainability of communities, while Huffman highlighted specific remedies such as Small Business Administration loans, an infrastructure bank and other policies that free up lending by financial institutions.

“Right now the biggest challenge to small business is having access to capital and that’s something that’s been frustrating to me as a state legislator because my toolbox has been fairly limited,” Huffman said, adding that more options were available on the federal level.

Lawson, meanwhile, called for a more transparent set of regulations for businesses.

“The economic recovery will be fueled by small business, it’s the engine of economic growth, so we need innovation support, incubators in every county as well as training our youth to be equipped in this very fast-paced, hyper connected environment.”

More than 100 people came out for the first 2nd Congressional District debate, held at Petaluma's City Hall and organized by Sonoma County Young Democrats. The second will occur tonight - .


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.