.
Feedback

County School Officials Hail Gov. Brown's 'Refreshing' New Budget Proposal

Despite proposing a major shift in how public schools are funded that would benefit districts serving low-income communities, the governor-proposed state budget for 2013-14 draws praise.

 

With a slowly recovering economy and the recent passage of temporary taxes via Prop. 30, Gov. Jerry Brown unveiled his proposed 2013-2014 budget Thursday and suggested a major shift in how schools are funded. The proposal drew praise from Marin County public schools officials for its heightened attention to public education, as it increases per-student funding for all levels of education.

“It’s a refreshing change from previous budgets in recent years, that's for sure” said Terena Mares, assistant superintendent for the Marin County Office of Education.

Mares said she was also pleased with the “governor’s attempt at changing the funding structure for our schools.” That proposed change was two-fold: underprivileged schools would get more per-student funding than other schools, and most categorical funding for schools would be eliminated, with the money delivered more directly to districts across the state.

"Our future depends not on across-the-board funding, but disproportionately funding those schools that have disproportionate challenges," Brown said at a press conference. 

In coming years, suburban school districts may end up paying the price to help the underserved, but Brown said only the shortsighted would not agree with his self-described progressive plan to bring equality.

“It’s a classic case of justice to unequals [sic]," he added. "We have to give more to approach equality. That’s the principle. I think that’s a powerful principle."

If passed, it would be the most substantial change in public school funding since Proposition 13 passed in 1978, Michael Kirst, the State Board of Education president, told the Sacramento Bee.

Mares said the specific impact on individual districts in Marin won't be known for a while, as Brown's budget is merely a proposal into which the State Legislature must sink its teeth. While most school districts in Marin are "basic aid" and are largely funded through property taxes, the San Rafael City School District, Novato Unified School District and Ross Valley School District are "revenue limit" districts and rely on a larger amount of funds from the state.

In addition to that distinction, the impact on Marin districts will largely be determined by the number of English language learners in a district and the number of students who receive federally subsidized lunches for low-income residents, Mare said.

Brown proposed a similar plan last year: a so-called “weighted student formula” that gets rid of a lot of special programs and allots money at a flat rate per student, giving an extra 35 percent for low-income students and English learners. The idea, however, was ultimately trimmed from the budget.

This year, he’s calling it “local flexibility,” and it’s designed to be implemented in phases. The plan would give more money to school districts that have at least 50 percent of their population as poor or English learners. 

However, suburban schools – which have been hurting financially along with the rest of the state – may ultimately get pinched. Brown said he was OK with that.

“Our future depends on it. If we don’t invest adequate funds in our children and their education, we will not have the economic well-being in future years,” he said. Aging suburbanites need a strong, younger work force to support them.

“One of the most important ways we do that is to invest in schools and disproportionately invest in those schools where there is greater difficulty in learning,” he said.  “I think the majority of the people are going to see that. “

He pointed out that schools in Beverly Hills and Los Gatos are far better off than those in Compton or Richmond. 

Brown also said the state's deficit is gone for the first time in years, adding it could reduce California's debt substantially by 2016.

"The deficit's gone; the wall of debt remains," Brown said, noting the state's $36-billion debt could be reduced to $4.3 billion by 2016. 

The budget proposed by Brown also increases per-student funding for all levels of education. By the 2016-17 school year, K-12 schools would see a $2,681 increase in spending for each student. At the CSU and UC levels, spending would increase by about $2,000 and $2,500 by 2016-17, respectively. 

Patch editors Cody Kitaura and Penny Arévalo contributed to this report.

 

Check out what else is on San Anselmo - Fairfax Patch:

  • 'Daily Show' Shouts Out 'Marin County Kumbaya Patrol'
  • San Anselmo Blotter: Subject Gets Arrested Twice in One Day
  • Commission OK’s George Lucas’ San Anselmo Park Plans
  • Deputies Bust 10 for Selling Tobacco to a Minor
  • Image on Marin Judge's Website Irks Law Enforcement Officials
  • Carpool Lane and Corporate Personhood Fight Takes First Step Toward Supreme Court
  • PHOTOS: Aliens and Sci-Fi Characters Invade Fairfax
  • IMAGES: San Anselmo Park Plans with Yoda and Indiana Jones Statues

Don't be the last person to find out about something! Sign up for our free newsletter, like our Facebook page and follow us on Twitter to stay in the loop. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.