.
Feedback

Dog Rules Stay the Same, Despite Debate

San Anselmo will keep its off leash dog rules -- for now.

Dog owners in San Anselmo can rest easy for a little longer. The San Anselmo Town Council was evenly split Tuesday night, July 26, between expanding off-leash dog usage in town parks and vastly limiting off leash, so the rules will stay the same instead -- at least for a few more months.

Last summer, and limited off leash dog use to between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. and from 4 p.m. to closing (30 minutes after sundown) on weekdays and just from 4 p.m. to closing on weekends. Dogs are allowed on leash at all times the park is open.

In January, the town also . Off leash dogs were banned from the picnic and Millennium Park areas and the council approved a continuation of the hours for off leash dog use from 7 to 8 a.m. and after one hour before sunset on weekdays and extended the morning hours until 9 a.m. on weekends.

At that time, the council decided to review the rules in six months. Six months was up Tuesday night, July 26.

Though the council also discussed a and budget deficit Tuesday night, the most controversial and flammatory issue of the night was off leash dogs.

Over an hour and half of public comment was evenly split between residents concerned about the noise, litter and nuisance of off leash dogs and residents who said they saw no problem with dogs being allowed off leash.

“I think the park can be shared by everyone,” said Ross resident Anne Brenner, who was one of a who uses and said they always pick up after their dogs and haven’t seen the excessive barking that has been complained about.

In fact, some of them said, it was just a couple neighbors upset.

“There are two people who are absolutely psychotic about this park,” said Michael Hollander, spurring a bout of yelling and finger-pointing in the audience.

Other said they felt that dogs off leash were ok, but not near kids and family activities. The off leash dogs, they pointed out, might be discouraging some people from using the parks.

“I take my dogs off leash all the time, I just take them to places more appropriate than places that have families and kids,” said Matt Brasler.

“Prioritize people use of your parks instead of dog use,” said Valerie Rogers, who said she had a neighbor on the East Coast whose kid had his face torn off by a friendly off leash dog.

Council Members Barbara Thornton and Kay Coleman appeared to be in favor of limiting off leash dog use to – an open space area – and to the . Staff noted that San Anselmo is the only town in Marin that allows dogs off leash in town parks outside of designated fenced dog runs or dog parks. San Anselmo also doesn’t have a leash law within town, noted Parks and Recreation Commissioner Doug Kelly, so residents can walk their dogs off leash and then get to the park and have to make a decision. 

Thornton and Coleman also appeared to be in favor of considering a leash law throughout town.

Vice Mayor Tom McInerney, , said he felt there were no real problems with use at , though he was more torn over Robson-Harrington.

McInerney also noted that some of the issues regarding noise and dog poop are dog issues not off leash dog issues.

“Do dogs poop and pee less if they’re on a leash?” he asked.

Mayor Ford Greene said that he felt things were going ok the past six months and compromise was important.

“No one side should get everything they want,” said Greene.

Since Council Member Jeff Kroot recused himself because he lives too close to Robson-Harrington, the issue was left unresolved.

The rules will come back for review in September or October.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.