.
Feedback

“Homeless Bill of Rights” Should be Adopted by State, Fairfax Council Says

A "California Homeless Bill of Rights" could help end the discrimination of people due to their living situation, Fairfax leaders said last week.

 

The Fairfax Town Council wants the California State Legislature to adopt a “California Homeless Bill of Rights” to ban the unequal treatment of those without a roof over their head.

At its Sept. 5 meeting, the council unanimously OK’d a resolution encouraging legislation that would require enforcement of existing U.S. and California Constitution-guaranteed rights. According to a Fairfax staff report, the proposed “California Homeless Bill of Rights” doesn’t ask for “the granting of special and extra rights not given to any other person or group of persons.”

The staff report (which is attached at the right) said people in Fairfax, Marin and California who are “blessed with great providence” have a “moral obligation” to care for those less fortunate than others. “The homeless too often suffer and incur discrimination, hardships, burdens and the deprivation of constitutionally protected rights solely because of their status as being without a permanent home.”

Would you support California adopting a "Homeless Bill of Rights?" Tell us below in the Comments.

The bill of rights (also attached at the right) protects a homeless individual’s right to vote, right to move freely in public spaces, right to emergency medical care, right to protection from disclosure of his or her records provided to homeless shelters or service providers, and the right to not face discrimination while seeking or maintaining employment due to his or her lack of a permanent mailing address.

Some of the legislative language the council approved is borrowed from a “Homeless Bill of Rights” that the Rhode Island governor signed into law in June.

 

BRAGMAN: LEGISLATURE SHOULD WORK TO ELIMINATE HOMELESSNESS

Fairfax Vice Mayor John Reed said he supports the bill to prevent people from “being discriminated against because of the reality of their living situation.”

Councilman Larry Bragman said “it’s a good idea to protect the rights of any suspect class.” He added that he works near the in downtown San Rafael -- an area with several homeless individuals.

Bragman, who voted in support of the resolution, said he was “bothered” the legislation “recognizes homelessness as a given fact instead of addressing homelessness.”

Instead of working to eliminate homelessness, the legislation “seeks to protect it and enshrine” it as a class, Bragman said. “It’s a sad day when we have to recognize homelessness and homeless people as a permanent class in the richest society on the planet.”

The council had a short discussion about if the legislation should protect someone’s right to sleep or live in a vehicle.

“The community would have to weigh-in on that,” Councilman David Weinsoff said. “Members of the community might be concerned about expanding the right for those who wish to live in a vehicle on their street and in front of their house.”

No one from the public commented on the resolution.

 

MILL VALLEY ADDRESSES PANHANDLERS WITH SIGNS

Fairfax’s call to protect the rights of the homeless are a sharp contrast to what many municipalities across the nation have done to outlaw homeless-associated behaviors.

San Francisco voters passed a law in November 2010 that bans sitting or lying on public sidewalks. Since it’s approval, many have questioned the law’s effectiveness. 

This summer, homelessness became a discussion point in Mill Valley when that encourage residents to give to local charities instead of panhandlers.

The Mill Valley council’s discussion about the signs included concerns about the safety of people asking for money on a “dangerous” median in Mill Valley, .

Mill Valley Councilwoman Shawn Marshall said she agreed with the sentiment that residents should support local charitable organizations that help homeless people.

“On the other hand, as somebody who does periodically help out someone on the street corner, I feel like putting those signs up is a bit intolerant and lacking in human response,” she said. “It’s not my way of being in the world. Putting a sign up there is basically code for saying, ‘We don't want you in our town.’”

In the past, the Mill Valley council came close to amending the city’s municipal code to prohibit soliciting in the public right of way areas like medians.

 

ESTIMATED 1,200 HOMELESS PEOPLE IN MARIN

A Marin County-wide identified 1,220 people who are experiencing homelessness in Marin and 4,103 precariously housed.  

The count revealed a decrease in sheltered or unsheltered people from 2009, but saw an increase in people who were “precariously housed.”

 

Check out what else is on San Anselmo - Fairfax Patch:


 

Don’t be left out of the conversation! Sign up for our free daily newsletter , “like” us on Facebook and “follow” us on Twitter to get news, blogs, announcements and events. Want to share your opinions with your community? Start your own blog here .

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.