.
Feedback

Fairfax Puts Half-Cent Sales Tax on the Ballot

Council opts for tax amount that had broad support.

A local sales tax will be going to the ballot in one town in the Ross Valley this November.

Although , the Fairfax Town Council opted the following night to on the November ballot.

Council Members John Reed, Pam Hartwell-Herrero and Larry Bragman said they were in favor of a one percent tax, but the one percent proposal had opposition from the business community. The council opted instead to support something that had broad consensus.

“This is a phenomenal opportunity for us to push for the true financial sustainability you are asking us for,” argued Hartwell-Herrero of the one percent tax.

She noted that a one percent hike in the state sales tax had just expired, so the amount people would be paying if Fairfax raised its sales tax by one percent would be the same.

“I don’t think people are going to stop coming here because of a penny on the dollar,” she said. She went on the make an impassioned plea with the couple dozen residents in attendance that a full one percent sales tax hike could be the difference for the town, which is struggling with what will be a $200,000 deficit this year when the numbers are finalized. Otherwise, she said, the town would keep having to come back for more money and more – consider charging for parking, reducing services, not paving roads. “I grow weary of this subsistence living.”

Town Manager Michael Rock gave a presentation about the town budget in which he pointed out that revenues, from property and sales taxes, have been decreasing in the last five years. Though the town has made extensive cuts and is “bare bones,” he said, with the lowest number of employees per capita and the lowest paid employees of any town in Marin, without more revenues extensive service cuts would have to be made.

“Without any changes, the town budget is simply not sustainable,” said Rock.

Garry Graham, owner of , said he was shocked by the proposal to go forward with a one percent sales tax, since . Graham also said he was prepared to put up an opposition campaign to a one percent tax, which would cost his business thousands of dollars.

“One percent is an overreach,” he said.

“It’s a little bit ironic that some of the businesses that most benefit from those [public safety] services are most vocal in their opposition,” noted Mayor Bragman about the possibility of being forced to cut police services if the town isn’t able to find more revenue.

David Smadbeck, co-president of the and owner of the , also said he hoped the council didn’t move ahead with a one percent tax. Though he said he understands the tax is passed on to the customers, it changes the way customers think about tips and the bill and what they want to buy. The Sleeping Lady operates with just a five percent profit margin, so “one percent is a big deal,” he said.

The crowd was evenly split, more or less, between those in favor of a tax to support town services and those who feared it would ruin the downtown merchants.

In the end, the council opted to go with the 0.5 percent tax hike out of a desire to have a consensus and not divide the town over the issue.

“In the end, we wanted it to be a successful measure,” said Hartwell-Herrrero.

"I hear virtually no opposition to the half-cent tax," said Council Member Lew Tremaine, who urged everyone to remember that they're all in this together.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.