.
Feedback

Four Marin State Parks Would Be Closed Under Budget Proposal

Revised budget released Monday maintains list of 70 park closures across state.

Despite a revised state budget presented by Gov. Jerry Brown today that saw increased tax revenues, a plan to close 70 state parks -- including four in Marin -- remains on the table.

On Friday, the  announced the closure of 70 parks in an effort to save $33 million over the next two years, which was cut from the state parks in the 2011-12 fiscal year budget.

The state would close 70 of its 278 parks on July 1, 2012 -- including four in Marin County and 19 others in the Bay Area. In Marin, , Samuel P. Taylor, Tomales Bay and state parks would be closed. 

See the full interactive map of state parks on the list here.

Despite several close calls, it would be the first time in the parks department's 100-year history, including during the Great Depression, that the parks have been closed because of budget concerns.

"Although park closures have been threatened before, this constitutes the first time in the 100 year history of California state parks that a serious, deliberate effort has been made to significantly reduce the state parks system. The message to our children and grandchildren is that we can’t save their natural and historic legacy. They can no longer expect to have access to a public trust resource that should, by all rights, be theirs," said California State Parks Foundation President Elizabeth Goldstein.

Although Gov. Brown announced today a surplus in tax revenue collected, the state parks closures remain part of the extensive cuts passed by the Legislature in March. 

During a televised conference this morning, Brown revealed that California earned $6.6 billion more in tax revenue over the next 13 months, putting the deficit to $9.6 billion through June 30, 2012.  

As part of the revised budget, the income tax extension that Brown hopes to seek on the ballot would be decreased by a year. Additionally, school funding would be increased under the revised proposed budget. 

The state park closure list remains based on the March budget, not on today's revision, but the revision did not include any plans to change those closures. But what exactly closure means remains to be seen.

The parks would be placed in caretaker status, the state parks department announced on Friday, which would mean gates would be closed and people would not be allowed to enter. But, in parks like China Camp and Samuel P. Taylor, where main roads run through the state grounds, how the public would be kept out remains unclear. (.)

Additionally, with increases in crime in some open space areas, , how those policing issues will be addressed also remains a question.

State Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, has vowed to help keep state parks in the North Bay open.

The lawmaker said in a statement today that the park closures were inevitable, but that he would work to allow nonprofits to take over park operations in appropriate situations.

"Until we stabilize the state's budget situation and find a better long-term funding source for parks, I'm afraid that our current functional park closures will continue," he added.

Huffman also said he would work to find nonprofit partnerships that would allow those organizations to operate the parks where it makes sense. In Marin, different open space groups could step in.

The California State Parks department said that despite the many parks scheduled to shut down unless alternate plans are made, 92 percent of attendance and 94 percent of current revenue levels will be retained.

The California State Parks Foundation blasted the list, though, pointing out that it includes 40 percent of all State Historic Parks.    

Historical treasures such as Jack London State Historic Park and  would lose their state funding.

Jack London park features a museum dedicated to the iconic writer that is curated out of what served as his home from 1905 to 1916. London and his wife are both buried at the park, and visitors can walk to a dam, lake and bathhouse built by the author.

Olompali is a sacred site for both Native Americans and hippies from the Haight-Ashbury days. Evidence of the presence of the Coast Miwok tribe, called the Southern People (Olompali), dates to 6,000 B.C. The tribe lived here until the 1850s and their descendants are still a recognized and organized group in the North Bay area. In the late 1960s, the Olompali land was privately owned and became a cultural gathering spot and commune. The Grateful Dead played here regularly.

"The message to our children and grandchildren is that we can't save their natural and historic legacy," foundation president Elizabeth Goldstein said in a statement. "They can no longer expect to have access to a public trust source that should, by all rights, be theirs."

Bay City News contributed to this report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.