.
Feedback

Marin Needs to Fund a County Morgue, Civil Grand Jury Says

A new report on Marin's alternatives for a county morgue was released this week.

The Marin County Civil Grand Jury is urging county officials to set aside money in their budget that would fund a new morgue facility, according to a report released Tuesday.

The report, titled “Marin County Morgue: Where Do We Go From Here?” recommends that the county set aside funds to transform an existing building into a morgue. Until then, all autopsies should be performed in the Napa County, the report said. 

All autopsies are currently performed in local funeral homes or at Napa County morgue since Marin doesn’t have the facilities. The Civil Grand Jury first reported on this in 2001, and again in 2009.

“It has been 12 years since the first recommendation was made and Marin County still has no morgue facility,” the report said.

Retrofit an Existing Building to Serve as the Morgue

Over the past five years, Marin County has reduced it’s $50 million projected deficit by $30 million, and cut its workforce by 200 positions, or 10 percent. Building a new morgue, which the report says could cost between $2 million and $5.6 million, would be too costly.

Instead, the report urges the county to retrofit an existing building, such as the 315,000-square-foot Commons Building at 1600 Los Gamos Road in San Rafael, to serve as this purpose.

The county set aside $1.75 million to pay for a forensic facility and morgue after the Civil Grand Jury reported on the issue in 2001. Since then, the county used the funds to purchase the Commons Building, where the Sheriff’s office, emergency operations center and other departments, but no morgue, will be housed. 

Why Not Funeral Homes?

The Marin County Sheriff’s Department is currently evaluating the possibility of equipping a local funeral home with the tools needed to operate as a morgue. County officials are looking to sign a contract with a willing funeral home by July 1, 2012, however the report states that this won’t be a sufficient long-term solution.

“The Civil grand Jury believes this is an adequate approach if all Marin County needs is a band-aid,” the report states.

Although this plan is less expensive, many local funeral homes do not have the equipment, like X-rays and storage for tissue samples, to perform professional autopsies and adhere to the National Association of Medical Examiners’ standards.

Napa County Morgue

In 2011, Marin spent approximately $110,000 for autopsies, of which $11,500 was paid to Napa County. During that year, 115 autopsies were carried out and five were performed in Napa.

If all autopsies in 2011 were performed in Napa, the cost would have been $225,000, or$115,000 more than the funeral homes, according to the report. The Grand Jury said the facilities are worth the extra cost, but the biggest disadvantage is the transportation to and from Napa.

Read the full report on the right.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.