.
Feedback

Measure D Debate Continues

Half-cent sales tax in Fairfax stirs up emotions on both sides.

A that will be decided by voters on Tuesday, Nov. 8, is .

The No on D Committee has created a website, filled with charts drawn from details in the town's audits. But, said Yes on D campaign head Matt Hartwell-Herrero, the numbers of pulled out of context or used inappropriately to try and draw conclusions that are inaccurate.

"They don't seem to be interested in the substance of what's actually happening," said Hartwell-Herrero.

According to the Marin Independent Journal, No on D - made up of Susan Brandborg, Bill Parker, Jory Prum, and John Molloy - raised nearly twice as much money as the yes campaign, but the majority of that was in in-kind contributions from Prum to build the website and videos.

The Committee to Oppose Ballot Measure D, whose supporters include four residents who have run unsuccessfully for Town Council and a former councilwoman who failed in a bid for re-election, reported raising $6,365 between Sept. 15 and Oct. 22, more than twice the $3,100 that Friends of Measure D reported raising during the same period.

The Fairfax Police Officers Association and the Marin Professional Firefighters, Local 1775, each contributed $1,500 to the Friends of Measure D.

Jory Prum, a recording engineer who lost a bid for Fairfax Town Council in 2003, reported making in-kind contributions worth $4,950 to the Committee to Oppose Ballot Measure D. Prum built the group's website and helped produce a short video presentation that can be found there.

You can watch a video debate between Prum and Mayor Larry Bragman above, recorded by the Community Media Center of Marin.

The half-cent sales tax would raise Fairfax's sales tax to 8.5 percent, with all the money raised from the local increase -- approximately $200,000 a year -- going directly to the town's general fund.

Measure D has drawn the support of the entire council, the Fairfax Chamber, former Supervisor Hal Brown, and a number of prominent business owners who were initially against a full one-percent tax.

The key, said Hartwell-Herrero, is that overall the town is struggling and budget cuts have to be made. Focusing on trying to catch the town staff in an error misses the point.

"If they came to us and said this is what I think the solution is, then we'd have something meaningful to talk about," he said, pointing out that the union groups all agreed to paying part of their pension costs and that there were a number of town meetings about the sales tax. "Where was No on D when those discussions were happening?"

Prum was at the Fairfax Town Council meeting Wednesday night, Nov. 2, grilling town council members on details of the July financial statements -- pointing out what appeared to be an error in percentage calculations. Financial Director Michael Vivrette said he would look into the calculations and, if an error was made, correct it.

The concern, Prum has said, is that financial information appears to be very opaque, hard for the public to follow, and rarely questioned by the town council.

"The real concern," he said at the council meeting, "is that the financial statements for July, which should have been available months ago; this information is in the consent calendar and would have been approved without anyone noticing the error."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.