.
Feedback

PG&E announces moratorium on Smart Meter program in Fairfax

Surprise announcement comes in light of town's proposed ordinance banning the wireless meters

PG&E representatives made a surprise announcement at the Fairfax Town Council meeting Wednesday night that they would be voluntarily suspending the installation of the wireless meters. The moratorium will be solely within town limits and just until public meetings can be held on the topic.

"Until we help educate your public," said PG&E representative Josh Townsend.

Although an ordinance to prohibit the Smart Meters for one year was on the agenda, Mayor Lew Tremaine suggested that in light of the PG&E announcement the council consider making the ordinance a temporary six-month ban.

"It would give PG&E the opportunity to be good to their word," said Tremaine, who also cautioned the council and the public present to "proceed carefully."

Although Tremaine argued that the ordinance could always be extended if at the end of six months PG&E had failed to make good on their word, his proposal was met with loud boo's from the crowd.

"I think minimum we should have a 10 year moratorium where we can have studies done and see if people have been effected," said Diane Hoffman.

Residents also were worried that PG&E wouldn't really listen to their concerns or consider a long-term moratorium on the meters, but would simply attempt to "educate" the town.

"I think that's a poor bargain," said one resident.

After raucous public comment, the council ultimately voted to approve the original ordinance banning for one year "the installation of Smart Meters and related equipment within the Town of Fairfax or in, along, upon, under, and over the public streets."

"This is not a democratically deployed system. It's a system that's being forced upon us," said Councilman Larry Bragman to standing applause. "This is what we were voted into office to do."

IThough it appeared the other efforts the town had made to stop the wireless Smart Meters had been met with few results, the PG&E representatives said they would be suspending the installation of the meters in Fairfax until public meetings and forums could be held.

"We hear the questions and we want to try and help facilitate the answers," said Townsend.

The wireless meters would use a combination of wireless cellular and radio networks to transmit individual usage data back to PG&E. Read about how the meters work here.

Residents have raised concerns in the past few months about privacy and security problems with the data being transmitted wirelessly, inaccurate readings from the meters, and health problems from electro-magnetic frequencies.

Read the basic facts and history of the Smart Meter program here.

Although PG&E has consistently maintained that it would not delay the installation of the meters despite rising concerns, the fact that Fairfax had pursued a number of legal options and was considering the prohibition ordinance spurred the utility to meet with Tremaine earlier Wednesday morning.

Tremaine told the public that he suggested to PG&E that they hold two public forums, "the first in which the community does the talking," he said.

Townsend said that PG&E would work with town staff to set up public meetings and forums and that no more meters would be installed until those meetings were held. He was not able to give any sort of a timeframe, however, that the deployment would last.

So far 220 wireless Smart Meters have been installed in town and four transponder access points have also been put on telephone poles. Eight-thousand meters (electric and gas) are planned for Fairfax eventually.

Bragman encouraged PG&E to "de-power" the four transponders during this moratorium period. PG&E said it would certainly consider that.

"This is a welcomed and significant shift in the debate," said Tremaine.

"This will not be like it was in San Anselmo. We are not interested in a dog and pony show," said Tremaine, who encouraged residents to also be open to PG&E. "A dialogue goes both ways."

Tremaine said he was surprised with the respect he got from PG&E representatives at his meeting with them and appreciated the speed with which they got corporate approval for a voluntary moratorium on their part.

"A long overdue conversation about this program will start here and it will not stop here," said Tremaine.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.