.
Feedback

Phoenix Lake Could Become a Flood Detention Basin

Supervisors approve plan to apply for grant to cover flood prevention plan.

The Marin County Board of Supervisors, operating as the Flood Control District 9 Board, approved a $49,000 contract with Stetson Engineering to prepare a grant application for funding to turn Phoenix Lake into a flood detention basin.

Flood prevention efforts have been in the works for Flood District 9 since a per parcel flood fee was approved by voters in 2007. The mail-in vote was challenged in court before being ruled legal by the California Supreme Court last summer.

, which centered on a hydraulic model of the watershed, was a proposal to establish flood detention basins to hold run-off during heavy rains.

According to the staff recommendation letter to the Supervisors on Feb. 1, Phoenix Lake was the largest of the possible detention basins identified. Additionally, the Marin Municipal Water District has agreed to study the proposal and is in talks with engineering staff over the the best way to create such a run-off basin. The MMWD Watershed Committee will discuss the proposal at their meeting on Feb. 17 at 1:30 p.m. The lake would continue to operate regularly most of the year, but during heavy rains water would be diverted from the creek to prevent spillover and flooding. The water would, then, be released back into the creek after the flood danger had passed.

The project -- which includes excavation of the bottom of the lake, a mechanical dam in the spillway, installation of lower level outlets, and strengthening of the dam -- would cost around $20 million. 

The $49,000, approved by the Supervisors, would be for Stetson Engineering to prepare a grant application for the California Department of Water Resources. The department issued a call for projects that have benefits for flood control, water supply, water quality, and habitat improvements.

"We think this project answers what they're looking for," said Jack Curley, a county engineer with the flood district.

The department is awarding $220 million worth of grants up to $30 million each, with a 50%  contribution from the local agency. 

This article originally stated the incorrect date for the MMWD meeting.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.