.
Feedback

Should San Anselmo Restrict Chain Stores?

The San Anselmo council continued a discussion at its July 10 meeting on limiting formula-retail establishments. How would you like to see the town address chain stores? Tell us in comments!

 

Editor's note: Vote in our poll at the bottom of the page. 

 

San Anselmo council members still aren’t quite sure how the town could ban, or restrict, chain stores downtown.

After , the council had asked staff to provide more information on the subject.

However, when the topic resurfaced for discussion on Tuesday night, some councilmembers agreed they needed additional time to mull over a formula-retail ordinance.

“My nightmare is that San Anselmo Avenue starts looking like any other mall in America,” said Councilman Jeff Kroot. But he added that he “didn’t know how to thread the needle on this.” 

Jennifer Hansen, the owner of consignment store in downtown San Anselmo, told the council members during public comment they need to decide if they are concerned about the aesthetics of chain stores or keeping local businesses. “You’re lacking clarity between keeping the town looking like it does or keeping the town with the same content. Are you going to have a discussion about how to make the bigger retailers fit in with the aesthetics of the town or whether or not we want [them]?”  

Vice Mayor Kay Coleman agreed. “We’ve done a lot of discussion about aesthetics and not about formula.”

Coleman spoke of concerns that a formula-retail ordinance would work against filling the town’s vacant spaces, although ultimately she “would like to see all the storefronts filled up with local people doing local businesses and having a great time. 

Interim Planning Director Diane Henderson told the council the town currently has the tools in place to address the aesthetic concerns with chain stores.

 

WHAT DEFINES FORMULA RETAIL?

A staff report (attached as a PDF) provided the council with possible “formula-retail” definitions, such as having 50 or more other retail establishments in the U.S.

Some councilmembers weren’t sure if defining chain stores by a number would work. 

Last month, , including the founder of High-Tech Burrito and one of the Red Hill Shopping Center owners, who were worried about formula-retail ordinance impacts.

High Tech Burrito Founder and President Greg Maples had told the council he was concerned High Tech Burrito would be considered a chain because there are 12 High Tech Burritos in the Bay Area.

On Tuesday night and last month, several council members agreed they wouldn't like to see a chain such as a McDonald's in town. 

 

'PROACTIVE' VS. 'REACTIVE'

On Tuesday night, Councilman Ford Greene said he was in favor of copying Fairfax’s ordinance, which requires formula-retail establishments to obtain a conditional use permit based on certain findings. “I don’t like the numbers approach.”

Mayor Tom McInerney said he didn’t see a need to add another layer of regulation. “It seems like we’re looking for a solution in search of a problem.”

Councilwoman Lori Lopin disagreed. “Once they come in it’s too late. I’d rather be proactive than reactive.”

The council agreed to continue the discussion to another meeting, giving council members additional time to look into the topic and study Fairfax’s ordinance.

 

FAIRFAX, SAUSALITO HAVE FORMULA-RETAIL ORDINANCES 

Fairfax and Sausalito are the only Marin towns with formula-retail ordinances.

In both towns, formula retail establishments must meet certain criteria to receive a conditional use permit.

The formula-retail debate recently became heated in Mill Valley, where , according to the Mill Valley Patch. 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.