.

Prop 30 vs. Prop 38: How They Could Impact Ross Valley Schools

If Prop. 30 fails this November, the Ross Valley School District will face $900,000 in cuts.

 

Ross Valley School District officials want community members to understand the major financial implications that could result from state Proposition 30 and 38, rival school funding measures on the Nov. 6 ballot. 

Jim Cerreta, Ross Valley School District business manager, gave one of the district’s 11 scheduled presentations on the topic to the San Anselmo Town Council on Sept. 25. There are three more opportunities to see the talk this month – see details below.

The bottom line, according to Cerreta, is that if Prop. 30 doesn’t pass, the district will be subject to cuts of more than $900,000.

Prop. 30’s similar but competing measure, Prop. 38, would create new funding of approximately $1,000 per pupil to schools within the district. Since the school district’s enrollment is around 2,230, Prop. 38 would bring about $2.2 million to district schools.

But if Prop. 38 wins, the $2.2 million would be offset by the $900,000 the district will lose with Prop. 30’s failure, according to Cerreta. (The measure with the greatest number of votes will be implemented – they each require a simple majority to pass).

Also, Cerreta said the Prop. 38 funds would be funneled directly to schools instead of the school district. 

Ross Valley School District would be more affected than other Marin school districts by the failure of Prop. 30 because it’s one of the county’s three "revenue limit" districts (the others are Novato Unified School District and San Rafael Elementary School District). Unlike all the other basic aid districts in the county that are mainly funded through property taxes, the revenue limit districts rely on a larger amount of funds from the state.

Prop. 30 is a combination of new taxes and an extension of some taxes that are about to expire, according to Cerreta. Backed by Gov. Jerry Brown, it would raise the sales tax by one-quarter of one cent for four years while increasing personal income taxes for Californians who earn over $250,000 for seven years.

Those who support it, like the California Teachers’ Association, argue its failure would have a devastating impact on schools.

What would $900,000 in cuts mean to RVSD students? 

According to Cerreta, the impact could include:

  • Reduce the number of instructional days by 20
  • Increase class sizes
  • Cut library staffing
  • Reduce the district’s ability to recruit and retain teachers
  • Create cuts to classroom maintenance budgets
  • Reduce the opportunity to implement technology in the classroom

Prop 38 has been primarily financed by Pasadena attorney Molly Munger, whose father Charles Munger is the vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Corporation, the investment corporation chaired by Warren Buffett. The proposal, supported by the California PTA which worked with Munger on the measure, aims to increase personal income taxes using a sliding scale, with a single filer earning as little as $17,346 per year, for example, seeing higher taxes, according to the Legislative Analyst's Office.

Prop. 30 backers are playing hard ball. Supporters of Gov. Brown have started a committee called Stop the Middle Class Tax Hike - No on Prop. 38 to oppose the plan. For her part, Munger has funded a TV advertising campaign against Prop. 30, the San Jose Mercury News reported.

A “yes” vote on Prop. 30 means “the new tax revenues would be available to fund programs in the state budget,” according to California's official Voter Information Guide. A "no" vote means state budget cuts, which would primarily impact education programs, would take effect in 2012 to 2013.

According to the guide, a "yes" vote on Prop 38 means personal income tax rates would guarantee new funding to restore budget cuts and improve educational results. A "no" vote would mean no additional revenue from the measure would be available for schools, child care, preschool, and state debt payments.

 

NEXT PRESENTATIONS

The next Ross Valley School District presentations on the fiscal impact of November propositions are set for

  • Wednesday, Oct. 17, at noon, at a Rotary Club of Ross Valley meeting at the Steakhouse Bar and Grill at Deer Park Villa, 367 Bolinas Road, in Fairfax
  • Tuesday, Oct. 23, at 3:30 p.m., at the Manor School site council meeting at the Manor School Library, 150 Oak Manor Drive, in Fairfax
  • Tuesday, Oct. 23, at 7 p.m., at the RVSD Board of Trustees meeting at the RVSD office in the conference room, 110 Shaw Drive, San Anselmo.

Both the Pacific Sun and the North Bay Bohemian have recommended voters vote ‘No’ on Prop. 38 and support Prop. 30 instead. 

 


Marcia Hagen October 15, 2012 at 04:18 PM
Because there is no apparatus for distributing Prop 38 proceeds to individual schools, with amount of funds based on number of low income students, it would take an additional year before funds would reach schools. Because Prop 30 funds would go to districts the usual way, they would be available much sooner.
Cindy Goefft October 15, 2012 at 06:26 PM
I understand there is a lag time in the implementation of the tax increase in Prop 38. So our schools would lose the current state funding from Prop 30 and have to wait longer than 1 year start receiving funds from Prop 38. I read in the Chron that it may be more like 4 years. Last year my son had 4 math teachers in 7th grade, partly because our district cannot currently afford to retain good teachers. That was a mess then; it can only get worse if we lose current funding.
MaryM October 15, 2012 at 06:49 PM
enough already. Jerry Brown is running the ninth largest economy on hatching chickens and holding schools hostage in the process. Prop 30 targets a narrow slice of EARNED INCOME earners who already pay extremely high taxes. You can't expect to balance a state budget on the backs of so few people. It's unsustainable. Furthermore, the tax is retroactive to Jan. 1, 2012 AND only 50% of the money goes to schools. The rest disappears into the black hole of State coffers. Given the unbelievable waste I've personally witness at the County of Marin and also the way ARRA funds were distributed here in Marin, I cannot in good conscience vote yes on Prop 30. And I'm a long time Democrat who has never voted any other way but Dem. My entire household of four is voting NO on Prop 30 and YES on prop 38.
C Ross October 15, 2012 at 07:45 PM
Yes, I know I'm dismissed as the naysayer. But frankly, I am tired of whining from the RVSD about not having enough funding. When my own child attended, there was significant evidence of both strange politics and mismanaged funding, which when I "complained" about led to retaliation against both my child and me. On a "bigger" level, when I was in Sacramento about another issue, I sat in on a hearing about mismanagement of funding via the CA Board of Education, with a group of completely oblivious (but apparently well intentioned) teachers taking the brunt of the burden. There is a huge amount of waste and fraud in our public school systems. I know it sounds all touchy feely good to say, "More money for our children". But the reality is that it's enough of a burden on taxpayers and many of us are tired of being made to feel responsible for the problems in our public schools. Eliminate most of the administrators -- such as those who take pay raises, go on vacations, drive around in fancy cars, while teetering on expensive high heeled Italian shoes, while laying off teacher's aides -- and budgetary problems will be solved.* And instead of wasting money paying private folks to shut down schools for the day and hold BS conferences at the Civic Center on how to dumb down the curriculum -- How many millions were wasted on that one? -- get back to the basics of hiring quality teachers to teach kids the three Rs (No, Recycling is NOT a basic academic skill! *I'm not referring to RVSD
Cinnamon O'Neill Paula October 15, 2012 at 08:44 PM
A yes vote for prop 30 ends cuts to the current public education funding. A yes vote for prop 38 brings in much needed additional funding for public education. A yes/yes vote for these propositions tells politicians that we intend to turn our failing public education system around and we are demanding logical, sufficient, and stable funding for public education. A yes/yes vote says that we are demanding real, systematic change in support of high quality K-12 Public Education. A yes/yes vote says that fundraising for everything from teachers to toilet paper in not the answer to fixing our Public Education in California. For more information and to join our united California voice for better education please visit http://www.educateourstate.org/
Milan Moravec October 23, 2012 at 11:07 PM
Einstein on Prop. 30, Prop. 38 – “Spending more money on doing what has been done in the past and hoping for a better outcome is insanity”. Have the innovative, thoughtful, insightful, creative teachers and faculty create methodologies to increase learning with significantly reduced resources $. Be American do more with less! No on 30, No on 38 and No on 32
Old School October 25, 2012 at 02:41 AM
Thank you for presenting this common sense reply. In reading the actual text of the law there seems to be a loop hole which favors Jerry Brown. All he has to do the delay the budget 45 days, declare a crises and he can take the money from this proposition. You can bet he will do this very thing.
C Ross November 01, 2012 at 03:29 PM
You're absolutely right Milan. And on top of everything else, look at how much money is being thrown away and wasted with all these propositions, campaign ads, mailers, phone calls, etc., etc..

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something