.
Feedback

San Anselmo Changes Its Mind About Sales Tax

Council decides not to put local tax measure on the ballot in November.

The San Anselmo Town Council reversed its decision, late Tuesday night, July 26, to – citing growing opposition and a concern about creating competition for .

“I’m going to change my mind,” said Mayor Ford Greene. “It’s not a good idea to go and do something if you haven’t done the preparation and your likelihood of failure is high.” 

Two weeks ago, the council . Council Member Tom McInerney was the dissenting vote. The only decision left for the council at Tuesday night’s meeting was to approve the resolution and decide on a sales tax amount of either 0.5 or one percent. A one percent general sales tax would have raised approximately $1 million for the town’s general fund.

However, last night, the council turned heavily against the sales tax, deciding instead not to place it on the ballot. Just Council Member Barbara Thornton said she was still in favor of seeking a local sales tax.

The change came after a presentation from the and from John Wright, a board member for the Tamalpais Union High School District.

Wright, who had also sent a letter to the council members earlier in the week, said that a local San Anselmo sales tax could hurt the school district’s effort to renew it’s own parcel tax this fall. If approved, the district’s parcel tax would start at $245.94 in July 2012 and rise by 3 percent annually for 10 years. 

“We’re concerned about competing tax measures on the November ballot,” said Wright. The Tam Union parcel tax, he said, accounts for 17 to 18 percent of the district’s budget.

“It’s my desire to honor the request of the Tam board,” said Council Member Kay Coleman. “And not be in competition of what they’re planning to do.”

Connie Rodgers, president of the San Anselmo Chamber of Commerce, also presented the results of a survey of business owners about the tax. According to the survey, 74 percent of the business owners were opposed to a one percent general tax and 53 percent were opposed to a 0.5 percent general tax. If it was a special tax, ear-marked for specific purposes, 56 percent said they would still be opposed to a one percent tax hike.

Rodgers also noted that in the list of the top 25 tax-generating properties, there wasn’t one antique shop or small boutique – suggesting that it’s not wealthy out-of-towners paying San Anselmo’s taxes. The primary tax generators were , , grocery stores, restaurants and a few businesses like and .

“This is really scary stuff for a business owner,” said Heidi Krahling, who owns and . “It’s a scary time.”

The town is dealing with an approximately $190,000 budget deficit, which it plans to close this year by pulling from reserve funding. In addition, Town Manager Debbie Stutsman announced at the Tuesday night meeting that negotiations had recently finished with the police and fire unions and the police officers and fire department were making a concession of a three percent contribution to their retirements. Town staff has also not had raises for four years and the town has made a number of budget-cutting measures already, she noted. 

The sales tax, it was hoped, would provide additional funding for deteriorating infrastructure, such as roads.

A general sales tax, which isn’t ear-marked for a specific item, requires just a simple majority vote and must be places on the ballot during a council election – either this November or in two years. A special tax for specific items, such as road maintenance, would require a two-thirds vote.

Council Member Jeff Kroot noted that it would take a $200 parcel tax to raise the same amount of money as a one percent sales tax and that the two-thirds majority “is really hard to do.” Out of five different parcel tax elections, he noted, in the time he has been in town, just two have passed.

Council Member Barbara Thornton said she was still voting to put the local sales tax on the November ballot, because she was concerned about the roads and infrastructure in town. She also felt that the town had made a number of budget-cutting moves already and that the council could make policies that would direct the money to go to the road maintenance fund.

Thornton also noted that because San Anselmo doesn’t have any appliance stores or large malls, residents are already spending their tax dollars to buy large-ticket items in San Rafael and Novato, which have a 0.5 percent higher tax rate than San Anselmo. 

“It’s my responsibility to communicate to the public that we have a need,” said Thornton.

Fairfax will consider .

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.