.
Feedback

San Anselmo, Twin Cities Police Facing Big Year

The two law enforcement agencies could consolidate by the start of 2013. Twin Cities Police Council to meet today.

Some San Anselmo residents have been surprised to see Twin Cities Police patrolling their neighborhoods lately.

Officers in Twin Cities Police uniforms fill in sometimes at the San Anselmo Police station.

The lines between the two jurisdictions might be blurring, and it's possible the boundaries between the two police agencies will be erased completely.


It's all part of an ongoing shared services agreement between the Twin Cities Police Authority and San Anselmo Police. Larkspur City Manager Dan Schwarz said at a Twin Cities Police Council meeting on May 30 that there have been some "dynamic" indicators that the two agencies are moving toward consolidation.

The San Anselmo Town Council held a workshop on May 22 during which council members asked about joining the TCPA. The Town Council also asked city manager to ask for a six-month extension of the labor agreement with the San Anselmo Police Officers Association.

"We take all of that in whole … as a signal that San Anselmo's going to decide one way or another on a course that would have them joining us, should we desire, by the start of the next calendar year," Schwarz said.

The Twin Cities Police Council meets again today, June 25, at 4 p.m. at Twin Cities Police headquarters. The agenda is attached.

Under the current shared services agreement, the San Anselmo Police share dispatch services with the TCPA based in the new headquarters on Doherty Drive. With the partnership, the agencies were able to cut staff from 10 dispatchers to seven and go from two dispatch supervisors to one.

“We found that that relationship was very positive,” said San Anselmo Police Chief Charles Maynard.

The two agencies also share one lieutenant and three captains under the agreement, which Twin Cities Police Chief Todd Cusimano says has created a considerable savings for both agencies.

A recent Marin COunty Civil Grand Jury report, “Preschoolers Learn to Share: Can Governments?” cites the recent merger of the Twin Cities and San Anselmo police departments as a good example of sharing services, with those agencies collectively saving approximately $500,000 as a result of the move.

"Consolidation" is a frightening word to many people, especially when it comes to emergency services. Others see it as a necessary next step. Fairfax Police recently agreed to share dispatch services with College of Marin District Police. The Larkspur and San Rafael fire departments are sharing chiefs.

The Grand Jury stops short of calling for outright consolidation among agencies, acknowledging that there are numerous obstacles to consolidation, including the difference in the financial health of each district, the job losses that would come as a result of consolidation and agencies’ interest in maintaining jurisdictional control, among others.

The report didn’t recommend specific service-sharing arrangements, but rather outlined a number of moves that would help the situation:

  • The county should immediately publish on its website a list of all of the special districts and joint powers authorities and their contact information, “to improve the public’s awareness of and access to all those taxing entities.”
  • City and town councils and the Marin County Board of Supervisors should require annual reports from their top officials to identify opportunities for shared services.
  • When facing major capital expenses on things like facilities and equipment, every government agency should seek out other entities to share the use and costs of those items.

— Mill Valley Patch editor Jim Welte contributed to this report

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.