.
Feedback

Sanitary District Approves New Pipe-Bursting Plan

Ross Valley Sanitary will hire five-person crew for new pipe-bursting program.

With many of the sewage pipes under our roads and houses close to 100 years old, replacing them has become a top priority for residents and for the sanitary district. But, tearing up roads to replace pipes can be disruptive, loud, and a little bit smelly for residents – not to mention expensive.

That’s why the Ross Valley Sanitary District has been running a pilot trial with pipe-bursting, a system that pulls a new pipe through old pipe, bursting the old pipe in the process. The process is faster, requires less excavation, and allows a larger pipe diameter to replace a smaller one. The sanitary district board approved a trial of the process over a year ago, which would use rented pipe bursting equipment and an in-house repair crew who would learn the new equipment, to “see if we could really save those dollars,” said General Manager Brett Richards.

Since 2006, the district has replaced about 15.5 miles of sewage pipe. In addition, the district has replaced another two miles worth of “in-lieu” pipe – meaning that by a consent decree the district is allowed to count the money spent on replacing pump stations and other facilities as pipe replacement. In the last five years, $27.8 million has been spent on replacing pipes and facilities.

With over 200 miles of pipe, 139 miles of which is less than 10 inches in diameter, it will take 70 years to upgrade the entire system.

Richards emphasized that two miles of pipe replacement per year is “an aggressive average” and the district is well ahead of other similar district.

“Sewer districts nationwide need to think creatively to get more pipe in the ground faster and at a lower cost to the ratepayer,” said Richards.

This is where pipe-bursting comes in. The district determined that it would be most beneficial to use the technology on pipes smaller than ten-inches in diameter. The district will continue to contract for specialty and large-scale pipe replacement projects, such at the Kentfield Force Main and the Woodland-College-Goodhill projects, which were both recently completed.

After an 18-month trial of pipe-bursting, using the in-house crew – much of which was done on Bothin Road in Fairfax – the cost of replacing a mile of pipe with the technology dropped from $1.4 million to $847,000.

Richards also said that it took the in-house crew some time to learn the equipment, so “with experience and practice, natural efficiency will lower that cost.”

The board voted to approve a plan that, in addition to continuing to replace two miles like usual, would hire five additional employees to run a full-time pipe-bursting program, replacing an additional mile of pipe every year. This would bring the district up to 40 full-time employees.

Municipal Sewer and Water recently recognized the Ross Valley Sanitary District for their pilot pipe-bursting program, calling it a cost-effective solution. Although the technology has been around for years, it is uncommon for a district to use it’s own crew to take advantage of pipe-bursting, instead of contracting the work out.

“So, we’d be leaders,” said Board Member Pam Meigs of the program.

In an effort to speed along the replacement of all the old pipes in the system, the district also has a lateral grant replacement program. The program offers up to $4,000 or 50 percent of the cost of the pipe replacement for private homeowners to replace their personal, lateral lines that connect to the main sewage lines. Get more information about the program here.

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.