.
Feedback

Supes Extend SmartMeter Moratorium for Another Year

In a brief hearing, board unanimously continues a ban on the installation of PG&E's wireless meters in unincorporated Marin.

The Marin County Board of Supervisors unanimously voted Tuesday to extend its moratorium on the installation of Pacific Gas & Electric's SmartMeters in unincorporated Marin for another year, continuing a ban first imposed in January 2011.

While the approval of that first moratorium drew a raucous ovation from a packed house of vocal critics of the wireless meters, the board's extension of it Tuesday was brief and largely uneventful.

Supervisor Steve Kinsey opened the discussion by noting that the California Public Utilities Commission has yet to institute "any opt-out provisions" or weigh in on whether or not PG&E is allowed to charge fees to customers who choose to opt-out.

"Even though I consider this to be a relatively straightforward procedure," Kinsey said of the moratorium extension, "it's still important to elevate our board's ongoing commitment to the community members that have concerns about SmartMeters. This is our way of prodding the PUC to finish the unfinished business. Individuals should be able to control our own destinies in our own homes."

Kinsey's comment was followed by comments from nine local residents who thanked the board for their continued action and spelled out their own concerns about SmartMeters.

The wireless digital meters came under fire in recent years because of concerns about accuracy, security, privacy and health effects. The meters use a combination of radio and electromagnetic signals to transmit data from the digital meter attached to your house to a transponder on a nearby telephone pole. That data is then transmitted via a cellular mesh network back to PG&E. Read about how the wireless meters work here.

A January 2011 California Council on Science and Technology report revealed the radiation from the meters is dwarfed by the radiation from items such as cellphones and microwave ovens, and that the actual radiation falls well within Federal Communications Commission guidelines.

The new technology wirelessly transmits gas- and electricity-consumption data to PG&E, eliminating the need for so-called "meter reader" employees and providing customers with information about how much power they are consuming.

The issue became charged here in Marin, with two women getting arrested in February 2011 when they tried to block the truck of a PG&E contractor attempting to install the SmartMeters in Inverness.

The enforceability of a SmartMeter ban is open for debate, as local governments have no regulatory power over the smart-grid technology of utilities like PG&E, and the body that does have that power, the CPUC, has already given them the green light.

A moratorium similar to the county's was passed by the Fairfax Town Council in August 2010. It essentially moved Fairfax, along with unincorporated Marin, to the bottom of PG&E's list of Smart Meter installations in Marin.

But that was two years ago, and PG&E officials claim that individual customer opt-outs have been minimal. In May 2012, PG&E reported to the PUC that "substantially less than 1 percent of PG&E's residential customers" have declined the technology.

In February, the CPUC approved a plan to allow opt-outs in February 2012, but has yet to yet to issue a system by which non-individuals, such as entire communities, can opt out. The panel has also yet to formally approve PG&E's plan to charge customers a $75 initial setup charge and a $10 monthly charge to use an analog meter. Those who qualify for low-income rates will pay a $10 setup charge and $5 a month.

PG&E customers can request to opt out of the SmartMeter program online at pge.com/smartmeteroptout or by calling 866-743-0263.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.