.
Feedback

The Norman Solomon Food Stamp Diet

The progressive candidate for the 2nd Congressional District goes shopping in San Rafael on a lean budget to demonstrate a point.

To be clear, Norman Solomon is not on Food Stamps. The American journalist, media critic, author and antiwar activist has a nice home in Inverness, a working wife, and is a current candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives for the 2nd Congressional District.

But during this week the 60-year old candidate is staying within a “food stamp budget” of $31.50 for a week, . That comes down to about $4.50 per day, and that’s the limit Solomon has put on his food purchases to demonstrate the hardship that today’s economy places on low income Americans.

“People in public office should stay in touch with the human realities of this very grim economy,” Solomon said when we met at in San Rafael for one of his quick shopping trips.

“I’m looking for creative ways to dramatize the impact of cuts in social services” that Republicans propose, he said.

He credits his involvement in the issue to Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), whom he spoke with last month in Washington, D.C. “She told me about her plans to be part of the Food Stamp Challenge, and it made a lot of sense to me,” Solomon reported on his website.

Technically, nobody is on “Food Stamps” anymore. Gone are the booklets of blue-and-green tickets, not unlike Disney B-tickets, that many of us (including Solomon himself) relied on in decades past to supplement poverty-level food purchases. Today’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) issues food credits via debit cards, determining eligibility through a formula of household size and income.

But whether stamps or debit card, $4.50 a day is a pittance, as Solomon finds out every time he goes shopping.

“I spent $12 the first day, a bit of a splurge, buying potatoes, rice and beans to get me through the weekend. And bargain avocadoes,” he added.

“The next day, Tuesday, I spent $9, mainly on sunflower seeds and oatmeal. I think that might have been too much,” he said.

He didn’t do any shopping Wednesday, and even though he attended a breakfast for the Committee on the Shelterless (COTS) he didn’t have anything to eat, staying true to his commitment to stay within a “food stamp budget.”

I asked him what was off-limits for him now that he would usually purchase. “Almost all fresh fruits and vegetables, for price reasons. Fish and chicken, dairy- they’re not very practical. And organics, which I usually prefer to buy.”

Before we began our shopping expedition, I asked him why he chose , with a just down the street. “It’s locally owned, and the people here are friendly.”

As we went into the market, he pulled out his “day’s allowance” – a $5 bill, which he mimed cutting with scissors. He strode past the bakery display bursting with frosted cakes and swollen pastries without giving them a glance.

In the produce department, he stopped in pleasure at an array of naval oranges, on sale at 48 cents a pound. “This is great – naval oranges and a napkin, what more could you want?”

He examined the avocadoes, clearly hoping for a sale price he could afford, but settled on a single pear for variety, 58 cents a pound.

Concerned about his protein intake, he began looking for bulk peanuts. I pointed out a display of nicely cleaned, and organic, bulk almonds and walnuts near the produce department. He shook his head. “Out of my pay grade.”

Finally, after asking several employees, we found Aisle 3, where the bulk cereals and nuts were. He considered the peanuts, the almonds, the granola, but settled once again on unsalted sunflower seeds, at $1.88 per pound the cheapest on the aisle.

While he was measuring out the seeds, I asked how the "diet" was affecting his weight. "I've lost some so far," said the trim-looking candidate. "But I imagine I'll be gaining it back this weekend with all the potatoes and rice."

At the checkout counter he was pleased to find his expenditures came to $2.87, putting his week’s total at $23.94 so far – leaving him with just $7.56 for the rest of the week.

Despite the bare-bones diet that SNAP allows, the Republican majority in Congress is still trying to cut the program's budget. “It’s not enough to defend against Republican attitudes,” said Solomon, in campaign mode again once we stepped outside.

“It’s also important to understand their discourse, and fight for a stronger safety net. Food, heath care, housing, education – these are all important.

“For instance, the federal budget subsidizes corn syrup. Lots of foods in the market have corn syrup in them, but it doesn’t add any nutritional value. Why are we subsidizing corn syrup? Why not local fruits and vegetables instead?”

You can track Norman Solomon’s daily purchases for the “Food Stamp Challenge” on his website.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.