.
Feedback

Drake fails to make the grade in math

Students perform well on STAR tests, but Drake's math scores well below state averages.

Most San Anselmo and Fairfax students are well ahead of state goals, and much of the rest of the county, according to the release of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) results today. But in math, Drake High School students struggled to make the grade.

State and federal goals from the No Child Left Behind program aim to have all students at or above a proficient level in basic language arts and math tests by 2014.

Across the Ross Valley School District, 81 percent of students are at or above proficiency in math and 83 percent in language arts. At Drake High School, 78 percent of students in grades 9 through 11 are proficient or higher in language arts.

However, in math, Drake failed to meet math proficiency targets. Just 40 percent of students in grades 9 through 11 were proficient or higher in their respective math tests. At 40 percent, the number of students proficient or advanced at Drake is lower even than the state average of 48 percent. By comparison, Redwood achieved 53 percent proficiency or better.

"We're always trying to do better," said Tamalpais Union Assistant Superintendent Elizabeth Kaufman. Kaufman said the district is working to develop internal measures to make sure that all students are achieving their growth potential throughout the year.

Depending on their classes, students take a test in general math, Algebra I, Algebra II, Geometry or a comprehensive test at the end of their high school career. In both the math and language arts tests (as well as in subject science and social studies tests) students are scored as advanced, proficient, basic, below basic or far below basic.

Despite the fact that the California standard is for eight-graders to be enrolled in Algebra I, 40 ninth-graders at Drake took the general mathematics test instead of the algebra test – putting nearly one-sixth of the freshman class two years behind before they even took the test.

Of those students who took the general mathematics test, just 28 percent were proficient or advanced. In Algebra I, only 24 percent of students were proficient or advanced. In Geometry, only 51 percent were proficient or advanced. And in Algebra II, only 27 percent were proficient or advanced.

In Algebra II, a stunning 37 percent of students were below basic or far below basic and in Algebra I that number was 38 percent.

The only math area in which Drake met state goals was in the cumulative math test for 10th- and 11th-graders who had already completed Algebra I, II and Geometry. In that cumulative math test, 61 percent of the students were proficient or advanced.

"Algebra I and II are a huge challenge for many high schools," said Kaufman, who noted there is a national debate going on over algebra readiness and when a student should be placed in algebra.

The high school district is currently working with the various middle school districts that feed into it to develop pre-requisites and ensure that students have the math background to continue in high school. 

California, in its goal to achieve 100 percent proficiency by 2014 (as required by No Child Left Behind), has implemented yearly goals that schools must meet. For 2009-10, the state goal is to have 58 percent of elementary students proficient or advanced in math and 54.8 percent of high school students proficient or advanced in math. In language arts, the state goal is to have 56.8 percent proficiency at the elementary and middle school levels and 55.6 percent at the high school level.

However, with just 52 percent (up from 50 percent last year) of all students in the state proficient in language arts and 48 percent (up from 46 percent last year) in math, California failed to meet these goals.

Schools that fail to meet these goal targets in the student population as a whole or in certain ethnic and socio-economic subgroups are deemed "program improvement" schools. After five years as a program improvement school, the state may implement certain sanctions ranging from a mere increase in funding to total closure of the school.

The annual STAR tests serve as a measure of student progress towards these targets, as well as reports for parents on their student's academic proficiency. Individual student results are sent home to parents over the summer; individual student results are not available at the school or state level and in no way follow a student. The results are made anonymous and non-trackable at the aggregate level.

School results are used to determine a school's Academic Performance Index (API) – a measure of its performance from year to year. In addition to STAR results, for high schools the API takes into account graduation rates and performance on the California High School Exit Exam. Along with certain yearly goal targets, schools must meet API and graduation targets.

The push to make 100 percent of students proficient, particularly in all racial and economic subgroups, was a key feature of the No Child Left Behind Act. When No Child Left Behind is renewed later this year it is expected some of the targets and standards will change.

Marin students, on a whole, performed far better than the state averages. And students throughout the Ross Valley School District, in general, performed far better than Marin County averages. In the county, 71.3 percent of students were proficient or advanced in language arts and 64.5 percent in math. In the Ross Valley District, 84.9 percent of students were proficient or advanced in language arts and 81.6 percent of students were proficient or advanced in math.

However, Drake's failure to provide its students with proficiency in math – even below that of state averages – falls below that of the state, county, and its own district. 

"We're proud of our students, our community and our success. That being said we still want to make sure that every one of our students are prepared," said Kaufman.

See the full results here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.