.
Feedback

New Manor Peer-Mediation Program Sees Success

School district considers expanding Peacementors and PALS to include classroom instruction.

is trying something new to improve conflict resolution skills in the kids at the Fairfax elementary.

Peacementors, a program designed to assist students in diffusing the conflicts of peers, has seen a success since it was piloted at Manor in the fall. The idea of the program is to allow children in accepted leadership roles (as “peacementors”) to patrol the playground and help contribute to a less chaotic lunchtime environment.

Any fourth- or fifth-grader, after recommendation by a teacher, can be a prospective peacementor. The recommended peacementors also volunteer for the job, and are then put through a training session for a few lunchtimes. These teach the peacementor to watch for three specific situations: blatant arguments, lonely children, and a general increase in the chaotic atmosphere of the playground.

In addition to dealing with any of these specific situations, the peacementors help make a generally safer atmosphere by simply being there. In the words of Peacementors coordinator and co-founder Kim D’arcy, “Just a presence of parents, or in this case older students, helps bring a level of conflict down.”

Initiated by KIND (Kindness and Inclusion Network Development), an organization of parents, the Peacementors program works hand in hand with a previously-existing program for lunchtime supervision: PALS, or Parents At Lunch.

PALS works to the same effect as Peacementors – providing a presence to mediate playground disputes. As the two programs essentially differ only in the age of the volunteers, D’arcy aims to combine the two into PeaceCoaches, a collaborative effort of the student peacementors and parent lunchtime volunteers.

PeaceCoaches would have a larger presence on the playground, primarily in the form of organizing playground games that discourage segregation by gender and athletic ability. As the more athletic male students tend to dominate playground games, PeaceCoaches hopes to encourage participation from less-athletic students who want to give it a try, but may be too shy to jump in.

In addition to including more students in playground games, the general increase in supervision will provide “more eyes and ears however kids need it, so they don’t feel isolated or alone in a difficult situation,” said D'arcy.

Given the initial success of the playground-exclusive Peacementors and PALS, the district will soon initiate a more in-depth program integrated with classroom teaching, instead of just playground behavior. Specifically, three different social and emotional learning curriculums are under review by a staff of teachers assembled by Toni Beal, Director of Student Services for the Ross Valley School District. Each program differs in the way it goes about teaching, but each one has the same essential goals as PeaceMentors – teaching students to mediate disputes with reason. 

How do your kids deal with their problems?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Anselmo-Fairfax Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jessica Mullins (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. To my knowledge, we don't have a comments stream anywhere. DefinitelyRead More submit your comments here (it's the most efficient way to get your thoughts heard at the higher level): http://ow.ly/l4cyg
M. Kathryn Thompson May 21, 2013 at 09:54 am
Dr. Gullion is also lovely with men who get breast cancer as my husband did, he's the best!
Bren April 22, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Is anybody else here getting multiple e-mail notifications of new comments by Jo Tog, and thenRead More clicking the link, only to find that they are actually old comments from Jo Tog, but with today's date on them? What's the deal? Did all his comments get flagged and deleted, and now he's re-posting them? Most curious.
Sierra Salin April 22, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jo Trog, we live in a Corporatocracy, not a republic. We abdicated the Republic after 9/11, if notRead More before. Know the difference.
Hiba April 21, 2013 at 06:52 pm
Banning the sale in a free market economy is too strong. I believe people should be able to chooseRead More so long as the product is labeled correctly, and even placed in a section with a big sign that says "GM Food products". Would I buy it if I pass the section at the grocery store: NO.
A May 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Many people in Marin are already at 50% or more of their entire income to pay for housing. And weRead More have no rent control here in Marin which is the only way I've seen that most seniors have been able to stay in San Francisco for several decades. Regarding your statement: "Market rate housing generates tax revenues, which in turn pay for schools, parks, emergency services, etc." Low income people pay a lot of sales tax in Marin (which is really high) and that also supports these causes. If they don't have the money to pay property taxes to own property, then the fact is, they just can't pay it. Be thankful that a large group of the population in Marin makes enough money to own property and pay it (and turn around and sell their houses for a handsome profit as well, don't forget about that.) Some folks here are just SPOILED rotten. Perhaps you should lobby that Marin employers just pay people living wages so they can afford to become buyers here and pay property taxes instead of trying to lobby against housing for the poor. Goodness knows how many taxes child-free low income people have paid to support wealthy folks kids and schools here. We don't get any of that, either, but we still have to pay for it...
A May 4, 2013 at 12:53 pm
I've heard that Marin is already in violation (either state or federal, or both) of not havingRead More enough low income housing in the county for its population. I think the county is under pressure to come into compliance which it has been out of in this area for a long time. This can only serve to better the lives of low income and elderly people in our county and perhaps reduce homelessness as well which is something we sorely need to do. However, what is amazing to me is that what we are calling "low income" housing in Marin still costs $1K+ a month per person from what I can tell. That's not "low income". Someone paying that much needs to be earning about $4K a month to keep housing costs in the 25-30% range that every financial planner recommends for a basic budget. I see a lot of low income people working HARD full-time to earn $1,600 a month here in restaurants, grocery stores, retail, hair salons, gyms, even clinics. They can't afford to live in Marin so many of them commute in from the east bay and further north to work in Marin. That is what is not sustainable. Think about the gas and pollution and the quality of life in the community due to turnover because there is no personal interaction with the staff of a lot of these places anymore because they don't stick around for very long.